Full Text
Translation output
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.3508 OF 2008
(Arising out of SLP(C) No.23105/2005)
ABDUR RAB AND ANR. ...PETITIONERS.
CIVIL APPEAL NO.3508 OF 2008
(Arising out of SLP(C) No.23105/2005)
ABDUR RAB AND ANR. ...PETITIONERS.
VERSUS
LALIT NARAIN MITHILA
UNIVERSITY & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS.
UNIVERSITY & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS.
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO.3509 OF 2008
(Arising out of SLP(C) No.26365/2005)
Leave granted. Heard both sides.
The appellants in these appeals had attended the academic session 1997-98 in the fourth respondent college Dr. Zakir Hussain
Teachers Training College in Laheriasarai. They also appeared for M.Ed.
Examination held in March, 1999. The result was withheld and not published on the ground that M.Ed. course was not approved by the second respondent - Lalit Narain Mithila University. The counsel for the State stated that the requisite approval was not granted. The National Council for
Teacher Education (NCTE) has also stated that the recognition has not been granted for this University. As the matter is pending for a long time, the appropriate authority http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
-2- of the Lalit Narain Mithila University may take a decision regarding the publication of the result, having regard to the various facts, within a period of two months. University may also consult the NCTE and the decision may be communicated to the appellants herein.
The appeals are disposed of accordingly. ...................CJI
(K.G. BALAKRISHNAN) .....................J
(R.V. RAVEENDRAN) .....................J
(MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA)
NEW DELHI;
MAY 12, 2008.
(Arising out of SLP(C) No.26365/2005)
Leave granted. Heard both sides.
The appellants in these appeals had attended the academic session 1997-98 in the fourth respondent college Dr. Zakir Hussain
Teachers Training College in Laheriasarai. They also appeared for M.Ed.
Examination held in March, 1999. The result was withheld and not published on the ground that M.Ed. course was not approved by the second respondent - Lalit Narain Mithila University. The counsel for the State stated that the requisite approval was not granted. The National Council for
Teacher Education (NCTE) has also stated that the recognition has not been granted for this University. As the matter is pending for a long time, the appropriate authority http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
-2- of the Lalit Narain Mithila University may take a decision regarding the publication of the result, having regard to the various facts, within a period of two months. University may also consult the NCTE and the decision may be communicated to the appellants herein.
The appeals are disposed of accordingly. ...................CJI
(K.G. BALAKRISHNAN) .....................J
(R.V. RAVEENDRAN) .....................J
(MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA)
NEW DELHI;
MAY 12, 2008.
JUDGMENT