Full Text
Translation output
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.4620 OF 2008
(Arising out of SLP(C)No.3664 of 2007)
PARAMJIT SINGH .....APPELLANT(S)
CIVIL APPEAL NO.4620 OF 2008
(Arising out of SLP(C)No.3664 of 2007)
PARAMJIT SINGH .....APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. ....RESPONDENT(S)
Leave granted.
After having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through the final
Leave granted.
After having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through the final
ORDER
and order dt.05.02.2007 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at
Chandigarh in Regular Second Appeal No.3876 of 1997, we find that the High Court without framing any substantial question of law allowed the Second Appeal of the respondent under
Section 100 CPC and set aside the findings of the two courts below. In view of the decision of this
Court in Gian Dass vs. Gram Panchayat, Village Sunner Kalan and Ors., (2006) 6 SCC 271 and
C.A.Sulaiman & Ors. vs. State Bank of Travancore, Alwayee & Ors., (2006) 6 SCC 392 in which it was held that without formulating the substantial question of law, judgment rendered by the
High Court in second appeal cannot be sustained, we set aside the impugned judgment of the
High Court and remit the matter back to the High Court to decide the same afresh on merits, after formulating a substantial question of law, within six months from the date of communication of this order. The appeal is allowed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. .............................J.
( TARUN CHATTERJEE ) .............................J.
( AFTAB ALAM )
NEW DELHI;
JULY 17, 2008.
Chandigarh in Regular Second Appeal No.3876 of 1997, we find that the High Court without framing any substantial question of law allowed the Second Appeal of the respondent under
Section 100 CPC and set aside the findings of the two courts below. In view of the decision of this
Court in Gian Dass vs. Gram Panchayat, Village Sunner Kalan and Ors., (2006) 6 SCC 271 and
C.A.Sulaiman & Ors. vs. State Bank of Travancore, Alwayee & Ors., (2006) 6 SCC 392 in which it was held that without formulating the substantial question of law, judgment rendered by the
High Court in second appeal cannot be sustained, we set aside the impugned judgment of the
High Court and remit the matter back to the High Court to decide the same afresh on merits, after formulating a substantial question of law, within six months from the date of communication of this order. The appeal is allowed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. .............................J.
( TARUN CHATTERJEE ) .............................J.
( AFTAB ALAM )
NEW DELHI;
JULY 17, 2008.