Full Text
Translation output
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4744 OF 2008
[Arising out of SLP(C) No.1382/2007]
NANI AND ANR. ... APPELLANT(S)
:VERSUS:
B. UMANANDA NAIK AND ORS. ... RESPONDENT(S)
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4744 OF 2008
[Arising out of SLP(C) No.1382/2007]
NANI AND ANR. ... APPELLANT(S)
:VERSUS:
B. UMANANDA NAIK AND ORS. ... RESPONDENT(S)
Leave granted.
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that as no substantial question of law, as is required in terms of sub-section (4) of Section
100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been framed by the High Court, the impugned
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that as no substantial question of law, as is required in terms of sub-section (4) of Section
100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been framed by the High Court, the impugned
ORDER
cannot be sustained. It is set aside accordingly and the matter is remitted to the High Court for consideration thereof afresh.
All the contentions of the parties shall remain open.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. ..........................J
(S.B. SINHA) ..........................J
(CYRIAC JOSEPH)
NEW DELHI, JULY 28, 2008.
All the contentions of the parties shall remain open.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. ..........................J
(S.B. SINHA) ..........................J
(CYRIAC JOSEPH)
NEW DELHI, JULY 28, 2008.