Vinod Kumar Verma v. Manmohan Verma

Supreme Court of India · 19 Aug 2008
Tarun Chatterjee; Aftab Alam
CIVIL APPEAL Nos.5220-5221 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP(C)Nos.11263-11264/2008)
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed the tenant's appeals against eviction as infructuous since the landlord had already taken possession of the premises.

Full Text
Translation output
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL Nos.5220-5221 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP(C)Nos.11263-11264/2008)
VINOD KUMAR VERMA .....APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
MANMOHAN VERMA & ANR. ....RESPONDENT(S)
Leave granted.
At the time of hearing of these appeals, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the landlord-respondent submits, on instructions, that the possession of the premises in question has already been taken over by the landlord-respondent. That being the position, these appeals have now become infructuous, which have been filed against the final
ORDER
and order
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
2007 and C.M.No.119 of 2008 (Review) in RCR No.49 of 2007, by which the Revision Petition filed by the tenant/appellant was dismissed and order of eviction was affirmed. Since the possession has already been taken over by the landlord-respondent, in our view nothing survives in these appeals and accordingly, the appeals are disposed of as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
There will be no order as to costs. .............................J.
( TARUN CHATTERJEE ) .............................J.
( AFTAB ALAM )
NEW DELHI;
AUGUST 19, 2008.