Full Text
Translation output
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.5394 OF 2002
SHREI NARAYANA GURU ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL ...APPELLANT
CIVIL APPEAL NO.5394 OF 2002
SHREI NARAYANA GURU ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL ...APPELLANT
VERSUS
THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE ...RESPONDENT
This is an appeal against an order order dated 14th of February, 2002 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Writ Appeal No.3821/1997, by which the
High Court had dismissed the appeal and held that the appellant-Institution comes within the purview of the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
After hearing the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, the parties have come to a settlement that the appellant-Institution is covered under the
Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, but such coverage shall be taken with effect from 1st August, 2005. The order of the Regional Provident
Fund Commissioner, Mangalore is accordingly modified to the extent mentioned above and the appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. .......................J.
(TARUN CHATTERJEE) .......................J.
(AFTAB ALAM)
NEW DELHI, AUGUST 7, 2008
This is an appeal against an order order dated 14th of February, 2002 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Writ Appeal No.3821/1997, by which the
High Court had dismissed the appeal and held that the appellant-Institution comes within the purview of the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
After hearing the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, the parties have come to a settlement that the appellant-Institution is covered under the
Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, but such coverage shall be taken with effect from 1st August, 2005. The order of the Regional Provident
Fund Commissioner, Mangalore is accordingly modified to the extent mentioned above and the appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. .......................J.
(TARUN CHATTERJEE) .......................J.
(AFTAB ALAM)
NEW DELHI, AUGUST 7, 2008
JUDGMENT