Full Text
Translation output
\,~ HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 2466/2011 ·
Ofo GURVINDER SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioner
CRL.M.C. 2466/2011 ·
Ofo GURVINDER SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
STATE&ANR
CORAM:
Through Mr. Khushbir Singh, Adv. with petitioners in person.
Through ..... Respondent Mr. rv1anoj Ohri, APP for State.
I\1r. Sohan Kumar, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person.
HON'BLE l\1S. JUSTICE l\t1UKTA GUPTA ORD~-::R
01.08.2011 CrLM.A. 8886/2011 Exemption allowed subject to just exception.
Through ..... Respondent Mr. rv1anoj Ohri, APP for State.
I\1r. Sohan Kumar, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person.
HON'BLE l\1S. JUSTICE l\t1UKTA GUPTA ORD~-::R
01.08.2011 CrLM.A. 8886/2011 Exemption allowed subject to just exception.
CRL.M.C. 2466/4011
This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 124/2009 under Sections
498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Tilak Nagar, Delhi.
The complainant/Respondent 1'-Jo. 2 Ivis. Upneet Kaur is present in person and is identified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and
This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 124/2009 under Sections
498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Tilak Nagar, Delhi.
The complainant/Respondent 1'-Jo. 2 Ivis. Upneet Kaur is present in person and is identified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and
CRL.M.C. 2466/2011
2011:DHC:11543 2__ Respondent No.2/Complainant lw:v.:: ent.;::;·e.d !.nto a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, maiTiage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent NO. 2/complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent on 91 h June, 2011. As part of full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner No. 1 has paid~ 5 lakhs out of which ~ 4 lakhs have already be~11~ p?iFJ t?. her and ~ 1 lakh has been paid today in Court by way of demand draft No. 115466 dated 26th April, 2011 drawn on Banlc of India. She further stale:) that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties haye amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, vol~tion and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimo:qy between them, it would be in the c, interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings
,_. pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 124/2009 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Tilak Nagar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
CRL.M.C. 246612011 page2of3 ',-.._--' I __!:, Parties have signed this order sh~d in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
AUGUST 01, 2011 'ga' ~ -~ ~v-f '1..---- / ,.,., t.
~ ~tJtP~ ,v~~ )' v-~ )L~;r ~~ Yl'~
2011:DHC:11543 2__ Respondent No.2/Complainant lw:v.:: ent.;::;·e.d !.nto a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, maiTiage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent NO. 2/complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent on 91 h June, 2011. As part of full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner No. 1 has paid~ 5 lakhs out of which ~ 4 lakhs have already be~11~ p?iFJ t?. her and ~ 1 lakh has been paid today in Court by way of demand draft No. 115466 dated 26th April, 2011 drawn on Banlc of India. She further stale:) that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties haye amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, vol~tion and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimo:qy between them, it would be in the c, interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings
,_. pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 124/2009 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Tilak Nagar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
CRL.M.C. 246612011 page2of3 ',-.._--' I __!:, Parties have signed this order sh~d in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
AUGUST 01, 2011 'ga' ~ -~ ~v-f '1..---- / ,.,., t.
~ ~tJtP~ ,v~~ )' v-~ )L~;r ~~ Yl'~
CRL.M.C. 2466/2011 tt!!~A~
3 (<ec_t~v-e.oJ :0.1). tJt) • f1 5lfb6
~ fJ.>.. I Lo.~. uf~/CmWL._j ;J~~ff~ R~evJ-' ,Jo-)__~
/U/'"· P/3':f5/a9 page3 of3
3 (<ec_t~v-e.oJ :0.1). tJt) • f1 5lfb6
~ fJ.>.. I Lo.~. uf~/CmWL._j ;J~~ff~ R~evJ-' ,Jo-)__~
/U/'"· P/3':f5/a9 page3 of3
JUDGMENT