Bishan Lal & Ors. v. State & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 02 Aug 2011 · 2011:DHC:18889
Mukta Gupta
W.P. (Crl) No. 1076/2011
2011:DHC:18889
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 324, 326, and 34 IPC on the ground of a voluntary compromise between the complainant and accused.

Full Text
Translation output
"h 63#$- HIGH COURT OF DELHI WP. (Crl) No. 1076/201 1
Bishan Lal & Ors. ..... Petitioners
Through Mr'. Ilari Shankar, Adv.
VERSUS
STATE & Anr. ..... ResPondents
Through Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel for the State along with S.I. Rahul Sharrna.
Mr. Manu Gupta, Adv. for R-2l complainant along with R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUI'TA oRp44 02.08.2011
Crl.M.A. 8959i2005 (Exempti0n\ Allou'ed, subject to all just exceptious.
W.P. (Crl.) No.1076/2011 This is a petition for quasliing of FIR No. 12011999 uuder Sections
JUDGMENT

3241326134 IPC registered at PS Farash Bazar, Delhi on the cornplaint of Itespondent No.2. The allegations as set out in the FIR are that while the complainant r'vas goilg hom his home to the railway station, the Petitionsrs came in fi'ont of him. One of thern stated that he is the persoil who was ptitting lock at their house atld asked to beat him. Thereafter, they beat him.. On lhe exhortation .of Petitioner No. 3 Surti Lal, 'Petitioner No.l Bishan Lal gave hirn a punch on his trose and with a sharp weapon inflicted injury on his left crr and back. T'he compiainant 2011:DHC:18889 2/ 'q managed to escape from their clutches. The ccrnplainant/Itespondent No. 2 Mr. Sandeep Jain is present in person and is identified by his counsel. He states that due to intervention of friends and relatives, he has entered into a Comprornise with the Petitioners and in view thereof he does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same vvould create further acrimony between thern, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, quashing of FIR No. 12011999 under Sections 3241326134 IpC registered at pS Farash Baza4 Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements rnade before this Court. Petition is disposed of. Order dasti. AUGUST 02,20L1 .NR' frfSv-*t^l t1'h-datt^k/ W " MUKTA GUPTA, J €.re.tra'in ) T idenL{Z 'lha letu o' 2 -;I"rytW (nar:;:;$ )ff 'r^eU"--A'L ) )t 2-4el>"-t -/'d, J4ttS(LtsL 2011:DHC:18889

JUDGMENT