Full Text
Translation output
16# $~ HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 826/2011
SAMITA DANIEL ..... Petitioner
Through: Petitioner in person.
W.P.(CRL) 826/2011
SAMITA DANIEL ..... Petitioner
Through: Petitioner in person.
VERSUS
STATE, GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & OTHERS ..... Respondents
CORAM:
Through: Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Additional Standing Counsel for the State with SI
Yashpal Singh, PS Chandani Mahal, Delhi.
Mr. Sanjay Relan, Advocate for Respondent No. 3 with Respondent
No. 3 in person.
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
02.08.2011 Petitioner along with her husband is present m Court so 1s the
Respondent No.3, the father ofthe Petitioner.
Respondent No.3 states that he had lodged a missing report about the missing of the Petitioner since he did not know about her whereabouts. He states that the Petitioner, is a major and as now it has been revealed that she has married of her own free will to Mr. Kapil Joseph, he has no grievance.
He has already given in writing to PS Gorakhpur Cantt., U.P. that the missing report lodged for the Petitioner be closed.
Yashpal Singh, PS Chandani Mahal, Delhi.
Mr. Sanjay Relan, Advocate for Respondent No. 3 with Respondent
No. 3 in person.
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
02.08.2011 Petitioner along with her husband is present m Court so 1s the
Respondent No.3, the father ofthe Petitioner.
Respondent No.3 states that he had lodged a missing report about the missing of the Petitioner since he did not know about her whereabouts. He states that the Petitioner, is a major and as now it has been revealed that she has married of her own free will to Mr. Kapil Joseph, he has no grievance.
He has already given in writing to PS Gorakhpur Cantt., U.P. that the missing report lodged for the Petitioner be closed.
W.P.(CRL) 826/2011 Page 1 of2
2011:DHC:18878 In view ofthe statement ofRespondent No.3, the Petitioner states that she has no grievance left and she does not want to press the present petition.
She further states that she along with her husband would go to meet her parents in near future and there she would make necessary statement even before the Investigating Officer at PS Gorakhpur Cantt.
Petition is dismissed as not pressed.
AUGUST 02, 2011 'vn'
2011:DHC:18878 In view ofthe statement ofRespondent No.3, the Petitioner states that she has no grievance left and she does not want to press the present petition.
She further states that she along with her husband would go to meet her parents in near future and there she would make necessary statement even before the Investigating Officer at PS Gorakhpur Cantt.
Petition is dismissed as not pressed.
AUGUST 02, 2011 'vn'
W.P.(CRL) 826/2011 Page 2 of2
2011:DHC:18878
2011:DHC:18878
JUDGMENT