Full Text
Translation output
"-, +
*
A-4
% 02.08.20Lr
Present: Mr A.S.Chandhiok, Senior Advocate with
Mr Sandeep Bajaj and Mr Gurpreet S.Parwanda, Advocates, for the Appellant.
Mr Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, for Respondent
No. L.
Mr R.SJuneja, Advocate for Respondent No.2 alongwith President of Respondent No.2.
Mr K.B.Upadhyay, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
FAO(OS) LL7-1L812OLL and CMs 4566/2O1L (delav) &
4567/2OL1- (stav)
Mr Chandhiok, learned Senior Cqunsel appearing for the Appellant, states that the Appellant has filed I.A.
No.9770l20lL which is pending adjudication before the learned
Single Judge. He prays that the present Appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn with an observation that the said I.A. shall be decided without being influenced by the impugned
Order.
Counsel for Respondent No.3 objects to the Appeal being dismissed as withdrawn.
We are, however, of the opinion that the Appeal deserves to be dismissed as withdrar,rm, granting liberty to each of the parties to raise all contentions that may be in the interest of their respective Client.
FAO(OS) L17-IIB/20II Pagre 1. of 2
2011:DHC:11616-DB
Appeal is dismissed as withdrarnm. Pending
Applications stand disposed of.
I.A.No.9770l20LL shall be decided by the learned
Single Judge uninfluenced by any observation made in the impugned Order. Parties shall be free to raise aIl objections or arguments, if they are so advised.
August 02,20tL nt
,lt
VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. tl
U
/F014
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.
FAO(OS) II7-1IB/201I
2011:DHC:11616-DB
*
A-4
% 02.08.20Lr
Present: Mr A.S.Chandhiok, Senior Advocate with
Mr Sandeep Bajaj and Mr Gurpreet S.Parwanda, Advocates, for the Appellant.
Mr Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, for Respondent
No. L.
Mr R.SJuneja, Advocate for Respondent No.2 alongwith President of Respondent No.2.
Mr K.B.Upadhyay, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
FAO(OS) LL7-1L812OLL and CMs 4566/2O1L (delav) &
4567/2OL1- (stav)
Mr Chandhiok, learned Senior Cqunsel appearing for the Appellant, states that the Appellant has filed I.A.
No.9770l20lL which is pending adjudication before the learned
Single Judge. He prays that the present Appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn with an observation that the said I.A. shall be decided without being influenced by the impugned
Order.
Counsel for Respondent No.3 objects to the Appeal being dismissed as withdrawn.
We are, however, of the opinion that the Appeal deserves to be dismissed as withdrar,rm, granting liberty to each of the parties to raise all contentions that may be in the interest of their respective Client.
FAO(OS) L17-IIB/20II Pagre 1. of 2
2011:DHC:11616-DB
Appeal is dismissed as withdrarnm. Pending
Applications stand disposed of.
I.A.No.9770l20LL shall be decided by the learned
Single Judge uninfluenced by any observation made in the impugned Order. Parties shall be free to raise aIl objections or arguments, if they are so advised.
August 02,20tL nt
,lt
VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. tl
U
/F014
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.
FAO(OS) II7-1IB/201I
2011:DHC:11616-DB
JUDGMENT