Full Text
Translation output
#11
J
% 02.08.2011
Present: Petitioners in person with Mr. D.V. Goel, Advocate.
Mr. Pawan Narang, APP for the respondent No.1/State along with 51 Sumit Kumar, P.S. Aman Vihar (10).
Respondent No.2 in person.
+Cri.M.C. No.833/2011
·." Petitioners as well as respondent No.2 are identified by the 10 51
Sumit Kumar, P.S. Aman Vihar.
This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR
No.1773/2006 under Section 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S. Sultan
Puri against the petitioners on the complaint of respondent No.2.
The reason for seeking quashing is that the FIR is the result of matrimonial discord which has been amicably settled due to intervention of the respectable persons of the Biradari, and now they are living happily together.
Respondent No.2 confirms that she has entered into the settlement with the petitioner of her own accord without any inducement or threat and she is living with the petitioner in her matrimonial home for the last three years. She submits that now there is no dispute left. Therefore, in order to preserve harmonious matrimonial life, she does not want any action against the petitioners on the basis of her complaint and she has no objection if the FIR is quashed.
2011:DHC:10666
Learned Mr. Pawan Narang, APP appearing on behalf of the late submits that in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties and in the interest of harmonious matrimonial relation between them, State has no objection if the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Since the parties have amicably resolved the dispute and they are living happily together, in the interest of harmonious matrimonial relation between the parties, I feel that no useful purpose shall be served in keeping the FIR and the proceedings arising out of the same alive.
Accordingly, the FIR No.l773/2006 under Section 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S. Sultan Puri under Section 498A/406/34 IPC and the proceedings arising out of the same are hereby quashed.
Petition stands disposed of.
~
(AJIT BHARIHOKE)
AUGUST 02,2011 pst
JUDGE
2011:DHC:10666
J
% 02.08.2011
Present: Petitioners in person with Mr. D.V. Goel, Advocate.
Mr. Pawan Narang, APP for the respondent No.1/State along with 51 Sumit Kumar, P.S. Aman Vihar (10).
Respondent No.2 in person.
+Cri.M.C. No.833/2011
·." Petitioners as well as respondent No.2 are identified by the 10 51
Sumit Kumar, P.S. Aman Vihar.
This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR
No.1773/2006 under Section 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S. Sultan
Puri against the petitioners on the complaint of respondent No.2.
The reason for seeking quashing is that the FIR is the result of matrimonial discord which has been amicably settled due to intervention of the respectable persons of the Biradari, and now they are living happily together.
Respondent No.2 confirms that she has entered into the settlement with the petitioner of her own accord without any inducement or threat and she is living with the petitioner in her matrimonial home for the last three years. She submits that now there is no dispute left. Therefore, in order to preserve harmonious matrimonial life, she does not want any action against the petitioners on the basis of her complaint and she has no objection if the FIR is quashed.
2011:DHC:10666
Learned Mr. Pawan Narang, APP appearing on behalf of the late submits that in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties and in the interest of harmonious matrimonial relation between them, State has no objection if the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Since the parties have amicably resolved the dispute and they are living happily together, in the interest of harmonious matrimonial relation between the parties, I feel that no useful purpose shall be served in keeping the FIR and the proceedings arising out of the same alive.
Accordingly, the FIR No.l773/2006 under Section 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S. Sultan Puri under Section 498A/406/34 IPC and the proceedings arising out of the same are hereby quashed.
Petition stands disposed of.
~
(AJIT BHARIHOKE)
AUGUST 02,2011 pst
JUDGE
2011:DHC:10666
JUDGMENT