Kanwar Singh v. Union of India

Delhi High Court · 03 Aug 2011 · 2011:DHC:18618-DB
Pradeep Nandrajog; Sunil Gaur
W.P.(C) 5492/2011
2011:DHC:18618-DB
administrative petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition lacking proper pleadings and documents, noting the petition was not maintainable in Delhi as no cause of action arose there.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 5492/2011
KANWAR SINGH Petitioner
Through: Mr.Arun Sukhija, Advocate
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Respondents
Through: Mr.Ruchir Mishra, Advocate for R- 1 to R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
03.08.2011 CM No. 11204/2011 Allowed.
W.P. (C ) No.5492/2011
ORDER

1. Learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with right reserved to file a proper writ petition inasmuch as counsel concedes that with respect to the course urged there are no pleadings and further the relevant docunnents with respect where to grounds have been urged, have not been either pleaded or filed.

2. Liberty granted as prayed for. This petition is disnnissed as withdrawn.

3. At this stage learned counsel for the respondents points out W.P. (C )No. 5492/2011 ^ 2011:DHC:18618-DB

0. \ that neither disciplinary authority nor the appellate authority and the revisional authority are at Delhi. No cause of action has accrued at Delhi. Counsel for the petitioner has noted the same. CM No.11203/2011 Dismissed as infructuous.

AUGUST 03, 2011 rs W.P. (C ) No. 5492/2011, v-«v<C^-Sa- PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J