Syed Mohd. Aslam v. Nikhat Ara

Delhi High Court · 03 Aug 2011 · 2011:DHC:11571
V. K. Shali
CRL.M.C. 2529/2011
2011:DHC:11571
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition challenging an ex parte maintenance order with liberty to seek variation before the Trial Court.

Full Text
Translation output
w HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 2529/2011
SYED MOHD. ASLAM Petitioner
Through l^lr.Irshad Ahmad, Adv.
VERSUS
NIKHAT ARA & ANR. Respondents
Through
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI
ORDER o/o 03.08.2011
JUDGMENT

1. This is a petition against the order dated 2.4.2011 dismissing the revision petition of the petitioner against the order dated 20.1.2010 passed by the learned ASJ fixing up the maintenance @?6,000/- to be paid by the petitioner to the respondents.

2. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is getting a compensation of ? 4500/- while as he has been asked to pay ^ 6000 as maintenance.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that since the order dated 20.1.2010 is passed ex parte, he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the Trial Court for variation of the order in the light of the evidence being produced by him.

4. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the 2011:DHC:11571 V petitioner, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty a prayed for. V.k. SHALI.J AUGUST 03, 2011 RN