Full Text
Translation output
24#$~ HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 1619/2011
RAJEEV SHARMA & ORS. Petitioners
Through Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate with Petitioners in person.
CRL.M.C. 1619/2011
RAJEEV SHARMA & ORS. Petitioners
Through Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate with Petitioners in person.
VERSUS
STATE & ORS Respondents
Through Mr. C.L. Gupta, APP for the State with SI Somil Sharma, SI P.S.
Gokalpuri.
Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 with Respondent
No. in person.
Through Mr. C.L. Gupta, APP for the State with SI Somil Sharma, SI P.S.
Gokalpuri.
Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 with Respondent
No. in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
04.08.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 5/2009 under Sections
498A/406/34 IPG registered at PS Yamuna Vihar, Gokulpuri, Delhi.
The Complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Rekha Sharma is present in person and is identified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and
Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent NO. 2/Complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent.
As full and fmal settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2, the
Petitioner No. 1 has to pay ^1.50 lakhs out of which ^75 thousand have already been paid to her and ^75 thousand have been paid to her today in
2011:DHC:10699 r t Court vide D. D. No. 023478 dated 9'*^ May, 2011 drawn on Bank of India, Noida, U.P. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the
' proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 5/2009 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Yamuna Vihar, Gokulpuri, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
The costs of?2,000/- as directed vide order dated 28'*' July, 2011 has been paid to Respondent No. 2 in court today.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their
, statements made before this Court. jv The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
3^^ MUKTA GUPTA,J ^ AUGUST 04,2011/'mb' 2011:DHC:10699
04.08.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 5/2009 under Sections
498A/406/34 IPG registered at PS Yamuna Vihar, Gokulpuri, Delhi.
The Complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Rekha Sharma is present in person and is identified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and
Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent NO. 2/Complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent.
As full and fmal settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2, the
Petitioner No. 1 has to pay ^1.50 lakhs out of which ^75 thousand have already been paid to her and ^75 thousand have been paid to her today in
2011:DHC:10699 r t Court vide D. D. No. 023478 dated 9'*^ May, 2011 drawn on Bank of India, Noida, U.P. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the
' proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 5/2009 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Yamuna Vihar, Gokulpuri, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
The costs of?2,000/- as directed vide order dated 28'*' July, 2011 has been paid to Respondent No. 2 in court today.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their
, statements made before this Court. jv The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
3^^ MUKTA GUPTA,J ^ AUGUST 04,2011/'mb' 2011:DHC:10699
JUDGMENT