M/S JETHANAND & CO. v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi High Court · 04 Aug 2011 · 2011:DHC:3947
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
W.P.(C) No.13226/09
2011:DHC:3947
other other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed local paper reporters access to the judgment and ordered its reporting, referring to a related substantive judgment in another writ petition.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) No.13226/09 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 4th August, 2011
W.P.(C) 13226/2009
M/S JETHANAND & CO. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Arun Vohra & Mr. Ajay Aneja, Advs.
VERSUS
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Rahul Bhandari & Ms. Razia Ali, Advs. for Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Adv.
CORAM :-
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
JUDGMENT

1. Whether reporters of Local papers may Yes be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the reporter or not? Yes

3. Whether the judgment should be reported Yes in the Digest?

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J. For Judgment, See W.P.(C) 2317/2007 titled as M/S Bansi Lal Kanhaiya Lal v. Delhi Development Authority.

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW (JUDGE) AUGUST 4th, 2011 ‘gsr’