Himanshu@ Chintu v. State NCT of Delhi

Delhi High Court · 05 Aug 2011 · 2011:DHC:18856
Mukta Gupta
W.P.(CRL) 610/2011
2011:DHC:18856
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court granted four weeks parole to a petitioner in custody for nearly three years, subject to furnishing bonds and sureties, to enable him to re-establish family ties.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 610/2011
HIMANSHU@ CHINTU
Through
VERSUS
STATE NCT OF DELHI
Through
CORAM: ..... Petitioner Ms. Neelam Grover, Ms. Asha Tiwari, Advs. ..... Respondent
Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for State with Mr. M.P. Singh, SI/IO P.S. Sarai
Rohilla.
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
05.08.2011 By this petition the Petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he wants to re-establish ties with his family members. On a notice being issued status report has been filed.
As per the status report the Petitioner's father is an employee in BSES
Delhi and the family consists of his parents and a younger brother. It also states that the Petitioner was also involve(j in another offence under Section
ORDER

324 IPC registered at P.S. Hari Nagar. Bowever, a perusal of the nominal roll does not depict any other conviction. W.P.(CRL) 61012011 , page1 of2 2011:DHC:18856 l In view of the fact that the Petitioner has been in custody now nearly for three years, it would be in the interest ofjustice ifhe is granted parole. It is therefore directed the Petitioner be granted parole for a period of four weeks on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum ofRs. 25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/CMM. One of the sureties of the Petitioner would be his father or a family me1nber. Petition is disposed of. Order dasti. AUGUST 05, 2011 'ga'

W.P.(CRL) 610/2011 ~~ MUKTA GUPTA,J page2of2 2011:DHC:18856

JUDGMENT