Full Text
Translation output
$- HIGH COURT OF DELHI w.P.(cRL) s82l20rr NIHAL AKHTAR ""' Petitioner
Through: Ms. Charu Verma, Advocate VETSUS STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI ""' Respondent
Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, S.C. for State with Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Advocate
Through: Ms. Charu Verma, Advocate VETSUS STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI ""' Respondent
Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, S.C. for State with Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
ORDER oh 05.08.2011 By this petition, the Petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to make agangements to file a Special Leave Petition in the hon'ble Supreme Court and to re-establish social ties.
On a notice being issued, a status report has been filed. As per the status report, the family of the Petitioner consists of four elder brothers, one younger brother and sister living at his native place. A11 his elder brothers are married. The brothers are residing with the parents of the Petitioner in one house.
In view of the fact that the Petitioner has roots in the society, it is directed that the Petitioner be released on parole for a period of four weeks on his w.P.(cRL) 582/2011 page I of 2
2011:DHC:18854 o ) furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,0004 with two sureties of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/ CMM.
Petition is disposed of.
Copy of this order be communicated to the Petitioner through
Superintendent, Tihar Jail.
Order Dasti. re'M-- AUGUST 05,20L1 'dk' MUKTA GrtPrAJ
,s*lt), eK )^ t . n r*fr, -**tffif. ffi^WrW .V^ l5*L/= -fi. i{t wn u,,,tt,+ hfi"'b{.(
4& w.P.(cRL) s82/2011 page 2 of2 s8# $- HIGH COURT OF DELHI w.P.(cRL) s82t20rr
NIHAL AKIITAR
Through:
VETSUS..... Petitioner Ms. Charu Verma. Advocate. o
STATE OF TIIE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent
Through: Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Advocate for IVIr. Pawan Sharma, Standing
Counsel.
ORDER oh 05.08.2011 By this petition, the Petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to make agangements to file a Special Leave Petition in the hon'ble Supreme Court and to re-establish social ties.
On a notice being issued, a status report has been filed. As per the status report, the family of the Petitioner consists of four elder brothers, one younger brother and sister living at his native place. A11 his elder brothers are married. The brothers are residing with the parents of the Petitioner in one house.
In view of the fact that the Petitioner has roots in the society, it is directed that the Petitioner be released on parole for a period of four weeks on his w.P.(cRL) 582/2011 page I of 2
2011:DHC:18854 o ) furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,0004 with two sureties of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/ CMM.
Petition is disposed of.
Copy of this order be communicated to the Petitioner through
Superintendent, Tihar Jail.
Order Dasti. re'M-- AUGUST 05,20L1 'dk' MUKTA GrtPrAJ
,s*lt), eK )^ t . n r*fr, -**tffif. ffi^WrW .V^ l5*L/= -fi. i{t wn u,,,tt,+ hfi"'b{.(
4& w.P.(cRL) s82/2011 page 2 of2 s8# $- HIGH COURT OF DELHI w.P.(cRL) s82t20rr
NIHAL AKIITAR
Through:
VETSUS..... Petitioner Ms. Charu Verma. Advocate. o
STATE OF TIIE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent
Through: Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Advocate for IVIr. Pawan Sharma, Standing
Counsel.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
06.09.2011 Crl.
M.A. No. L0523/20LL (Modification)
By this application the Petitioner seeks modification of the order dated
5th August,20II. According to the Petitioner his father is not in a position to arrange two sureties of Rs. 25,0001-. This Court had imposed the condition of two sureties of Rs. 25,0001- each because of the reason that besides being involved in the present case wherein the Petitioner is seeking parole, he was found involved in three other cases relating to Haryana and
Delhi for offences punishable under Section 379 IPC. However, since the
Petitioner's father has not been able to affange the two sureties, the order dated 5th August,2OIl is modified to the extent that the Petitioner be now released on parole for a period of four weeks on his fumishing a personal r
D bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- with two sureties of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/CMM out of which one suretv will be the family of the Petitioner.
Application stands deposed of.
Copy of the order be communicated to the Petitioner through the
Superintendent, Tihar Jail. rM@ SEPTEMBER 06. 2011. ovn'
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
6, r^. h \ rcrr \ r t -S*+ildilfr# 'o'a e'cdt6hlll
-{Y,'h
06.09.2011 Crl.
M.A. No. L0523/20LL (Modification)
By this application the Petitioner seeks modification of the order dated
5th August,20II. According to the Petitioner his father is not in a position to arrange two sureties of Rs. 25,0001-. This Court had imposed the condition of two sureties of Rs. 25,0001- each because of the reason that besides being involved in the present case wherein the Petitioner is seeking parole, he was found involved in three other cases relating to Haryana and
Delhi for offences punishable under Section 379 IPC. However, since the
Petitioner's father has not been able to affange the two sureties, the order dated 5th August,2OIl is modified to the extent that the Petitioner be now released on parole for a period of four weeks on his fumishing a personal r
D bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- with two sureties of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/CMM out of which one suretv will be the family of the Petitioner.
Application stands deposed of.
Copy of the order be communicated to the Petitioner through the
Superintendent, Tihar Jail. rM@ SEPTEMBER 06. 2011. ovn'
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
6, r^. h \ rcrr \ r t -S*+ildilfr# 'o'a e'cdt6hlll
-{Y,'h
JUDGMENT