Vipin & Anr v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors

Delhi High Court · 05 Aug 2011 · 2011:DHC:18831
Mukta Gupta
2011:DHC:18831
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition directing closure of the FIR under Sections 363 and 355 IPC based on the complainant's withdrawal of grievance and the petitioners' assurance of no current threat.

Full Text
Translation output
\4 40l $- HIGH COURT OF DELHI w.P.(cRL) 32st20rr
VIPIN & ANR ""' Petitioner
Through: Mr. M.M. Singh &' Mr. S.K. Singh, Advocates
VETSUS
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for the State with
SI Alok Bajpai, PS SP Badli.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
ORDER oh 05.08.2011 ,Sub-Inspector Joginder from Rohtak is present in Court and states that a cancellation report dated 7tr' June, 2OII has been prepared in FIR No. 1l9l20lI under Section 363/355 IPC.
Respondent No. 3 is not present despite service. Apparently, as he has no grievance left he has stated to the Investigating Officer that this FIR may be closed and thus he has not appeared. Learned counsel for the Petitioner on instructions from the Petitioners also states that for the time being they are not receiving any threat, however at any stage if they receive threat, they would approach the SHO concerned who would take action in accordance with law.
Petition is disposed of. Order Dasti.
Itv^&n /1r,'n // / t- .
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
AUGUST 05, 201L 'dk' 2011:DHC:18831
JUDGMENT