Mohd Zakir v. State

Delhi High Court · 05 Aug 2011 · 2011:DHC:18821
Mukta Gupta
W.P.(Crl) 1846/2010
2011:DHC:18821
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court dismissed a petition alleging police inaction after the State demonstrated adequate preventive measures and the petitioner chose to withdraw the petition.

Full Text
Translation output
$-
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF w.P.(cRL) 184612010
MOHD ZAKIR
Through:
DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Petitioner
Mr. K. Venkatramni. Advocate oh
VETSUS
STATE ..... Respondent
Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for State with
Insp. Kanwar Sain, Ps MaYur Vihar
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
05.08.2011
By this petition, the Petitioner states that he is a resident of Block-l5
Trilokpuri. He states that in Block Nos. 15 and 16 there are nearly thousands of houses and in and around these houses illegal activities including sale of narcotic substances, gambling, chain snatching regularly occurs and no action is taken by the police to prevent the same.
On a notice being issued, a status report has been filed. As per the status report, as and when there are complaints of gambling or any other offence, action thereon have been taken and in this regard 42 cases have been registered within the years 2010. Besides this, preventive actionunder Sections I07l151 Cr.P.C. is also being taken. Further status repoft has been filed according to which a PCR Van
2011:DHC:18821
r halting base has been fixed between Block No. 13 and 15 to keep special attentiori and vigil upon the activities at Block Nos. 15 and 16, an alternative picket have been deployed at Block 16 which is hardly 20 meter far from Block No. 15 Trilok
Puri. A joint patrolling of Beat Staff, Block No. 15 and 16 is also being conducted regularly. Further, FootAylotor Cycle patrolling have been intensified around this area and surprise checking of Senior Officers is also being conducted time to time.
In view of the status report filed by the State, learned counsel for the
Petitioner states that nothing survives in the present petition and he wishes to withdraw the present petition.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. yAkh4,&
- [/
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
AUGUST 05, 201L
'dk'
2011:DHC:18821
JUDGMENT