Full Text
Translation output
$—39
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 765/2011
SUBHASH KUMAR Petitioner
Through Mr. Galib Kabir, Adv.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 765/2011
SUBHASH KUMAR Petitioner
Through Mr. Galib Kabir, Adv.
VERSUS
STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI Respondent
Through Mr. Pawan Sharma, SC for State with Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Adv. with Mr. Ashok Kumar Saini, SI, P.S. Vasant
Vihar.
Through Mr. Pawan Sharma, SC for State with Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Adv. with Mr. Ashok Kumar Saini, SI, P.S. Vasant
Vihar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
ORDER o/o 08.08.2011 By this petition the Petitioner seeks parole onthe ground that he wants to re-establish ties. On a notice being issued it has been verified that the
Petitioner's wife is residing at VPO-Dhanag, P.S. Baijnath, Distt. Kangra, Himachal Pradesh. She has three children who are studying in a Govt. High
School, Gram Dhanag. She works under NAREGA project for her livelihood. The Petitioner's brothers and sisters are living separately and have no contact with the Petitioner's family. The Petitioner is in custody since 9'^ December, 2009 andthe sentence imposed on the Petitioner was for
ORDER o/o 08.08.2011 By this petition the Petitioner seeks parole onthe ground that he wants to re-establish ties. On a notice being issued it has been verified that the
Petitioner's wife is residing at VPO-Dhanag, P.S. Baijnath, Distt. Kangra, Himachal Pradesh. She has three children who are studying in a Govt. High
School, Gram Dhanag. She works under NAREGA project for her livelihood. The Petitioner's brothers and sisters are living separately and have no contact with the Petitioner's family. The Petitioner is in custody since 9'^ December, 2009 andthe sentence imposed on the Petitioner was for
W.R(CRL) 765/2011
2011:DHC:18869 a period of 7 years out of which nearly one year sentence remains to be undergone.
In view of the fact that the Petitioner has been in custody for nearly one and a half year and the unexpired portion of the imprisonment that remains to be undergone is one year, I am not inclined to grant parole to the
Petitioner re-establish ties. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Inder Singh Vs.
State ofDelhi Administration (1978) 4 SCC 161 held that in case the convict is in jail for long then cautious and guided parole should be granted once in an year.
Petition is dismissed.
Copy of the order be communicated to the Petitioner through
Superintendent Tihar Jail.
MUKTA GUPTA,J AUGUST 08, 2011 'ga'
2011:DHC:18869 a period of 7 years out of which nearly one year sentence remains to be undergone.
In view of the fact that the Petitioner has been in custody for nearly one and a half year and the unexpired portion of the imprisonment that remains to be undergone is one year, I am not inclined to grant parole to the
Petitioner re-establish ties. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Inder Singh Vs.
State ofDelhi Administration (1978) 4 SCC 161 held that in case the convict is in jail for long then cautious and guided parole should be granted once in an year.
Petition is dismissed.
Copy of the order be communicated to the Petitioner through
Superintendent Tihar Jail.
MUKTA GUPTA,J AUGUST 08, 2011 'ga'
W.F.(CRL) 765/2011 page 2 of2
2011:DHC:18869
2011:DHC:18869
JUDGMENT