Full Text
Translation output
"t ')/ $-6 HIGH COURT OF DELHI w.P.(c) 5s83 t20rl
UNION OF |NDIA AND ANR. ..... petitioner
Through: Mr.Rajesh Katyal, Advocate.
UNION OF |NDIA AND ANR. ..... petitioner
Through: Mr.Rajesh Katyal, Advocate.
VERSUS
C t vOVIND JHA AND ANR, ..... Respondents
Through: Mr.Govind Jha, R-l in person.
Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for R-2l UPSC
Through: Mr.Govind Jha, R-l in person.
Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for R-2l UPSC
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HON,BLE MR. JUSTTCE SUNTL GAUR o/o &%B5B', Caveat No.67 O/20II
Respondent/ caveator appears and therefore, caveator is discharged.
CM No.11402/2011 Allowed.
W.P.(C) No.5583/2011
HON,BLE MR. JUSTTCE SUNTL GAUR o/o &%B5B', Caveat No.67 O/20II
Respondent/ caveator appears and therefore, caveator is discharged.
CM No.11402/2011 Allowed.
W.P.(C) No.5583/2011
JUDGMENT
1. After some arguments learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition stating that the petitioner intends to file an application seeking review before the Tribunal of its order W.P. (c)No.5583/2Qj.[1] 2011:DHC:18188-DB j dated 4.3.20!L
2. The statement is made by learned counsel on instructions from Mr. Sheo Prasad Ram, Joint Director (Legal) MES.
3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.
4. Needless to state if petitioner seeks the review before the Tribunal of its order dated 4.3.2011, the review application would be decided as per law relating to review.
5. Dasti. CM No. 11402/2011 Dismissed as infructuous. r: "t"-QO? 0(} PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J a suNtl GAUR, J AUGUST 08, 2OI.[1] rS