Full Text
Translation output
.a'
L4
7o O8.08.2O11
Present: Mr. V.M. lssar for the petitioner along with petitioner.
Mr. Pradeep Chandel for respondent No. 1.
Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna with Mr. Jitendra Kumar for respondents No. 2 and 3.
+W.P.(C) No. 5455/201O
*
Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, counsel appearing for respondents No. 2 and 3 submits that only one adopted son can be admissible for grant of medical facilities and not the two adopted sons. Mr. V.M. lssar, counsel appearing for the petitioner on instructions from the petitioner, who is present in Court, states that the petitioner will not claim the medical benefits in respect of Bharat Bushan and will claim the medical benefits only for Rahul the other adopted son. Counsel also submits that both the sons were adopted by the petitioner vide two separate adoptions deeds and the same were also registered before the office of
Sub-Registrar. Counsel also submits that the petitioner adopted both the said sons after the murder of his two sons. Counsel also submits that the two sons of the'petitioner, who were murdered, they did not left behind any progeny.
I have heard learhed counsel for the parties. ln the present case the petitioner had adopted two of his grandsons for which two separate adoption deeds were executed and
2011:DHC:18022
A a registered and under the rules only one of the adopted son can be admitted for the grant of the medical facilities. The petitioner, who is present in Court, has agreed that he will claim the medical benefits only for one of the adopted son i.e. Rahul and will not claim any medical benefit for the another adopted son Bharat Bushan. The petitioner further submits that for the other adopted son Bharat
Bushan will also not claim any right grant of family pension. Let affidavit to this effect be filed by the petitioner within a period of one week.
Subject to the filing of the said affidavit within a period of one week in terms of the observations made herein above the present petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to grant medical benefits only to one of the adopted son i.e. Rahul.
Dasti. a aucusr 08, 2011 rkr
A
*,rffirBHrR,J
2011:DHC:18022
L4
7o O8.08.2O11
Present: Mr. V.M. lssar for the petitioner along with petitioner.
Mr. Pradeep Chandel for respondent No. 1.
Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna with Mr. Jitendra Kumar for respondents No. 2 and 3.
+W.P.(C) No. 5455/201O
*
Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, counsel appearing for respondents No. 2 and 3 submits that only one adopted son can be admissible for grant of medical facilities and not the two adopted sons. Mr. V.M. lssar, counsel appearing for the petitioner on instructions from the petitioner, who is present in Court, states that the petitioner will not claim the medical benefits in respect of Bharat Bushan and will claim the medical benefits only for Rahul the other adopted son. Counsel also submits that both the sons were adopted by the petitioner vide two separate adoptions deeds and the same were also registered before the office of
Sub-Registrar. Counsel also submits that the petitioner adopted both the said sons after the murder of his two sons. Counsel also submits that the two sons of the'petitioner, who were murdered, they did not left behind any progeny.
I have heard learhed counsel for the parties. ln the present case the petitioner had adopted two of his grandsons for which two separate adoption deeds were executed and
2011:DHC:18022
A a registered and under the rules only one of the adopted son can be admitted for the grant of the medical facilities. The petitioner, who is present in Court, has agreed that he will claim the medical benefits only for one of the adopted son i.e. Rahul and will not claim any medical benefit for the another adopted son Bharat Bushan. The petitioner further submits that for the other adopted son Bharat
Bushan will also not claim any right grant of family pension. Let affidavit to this effect be filed by the petitioner within a period of one week.
Subject to the filing of the said affidavit within a period of one week in terms of the observations made herein above the present petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to grant medical benefits only to one of the adopted son i.e. Rahul.
Dasti. a aucusr 08, 2011 rkr
A
*,rffirBHrR,J
2011:DHC:18022
JUDGMENT