Full Text
Translation output
1- s-23 HIGH COURT OF DELHI CRL.M.C . 17lll20l1 & Crl. M.A.620912011(stay)
REKFIA GUPTA & ANR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Jabar Singh, Advocate
REKFIA GUPTA & ANR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Jabar Singh, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP for the State with SI Vikram Singh, P.S. Kotwali, Delhi
Mr. Imran Khan, Advocate for Respondent no.2
Through:
Mr. Imran Khan, Advocate for Respondent no.2
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
ORDER o 08.08.2011 Report has been received from the learned trial court that accused nos. 2 and 3 have been acquitted in cornplaint case no.405212006 under Section l38ll4l, Negotiable Instruments Act pending before the Learned Metropolitan Magistrate.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that since Petitioners have been acquitted in the present case, he does not press the present petition with liberty to file fresh petition seeking quashing of the FIR registered against him.
The present petition dismissed as infructuous with liberly to the petitioners to take appropriate rernedies if so adviced for quashing of FIR.
W4,7L -MUKTA GUPTA, J.
AUGUST 08, 201I. rbt 2011:DHC:8936
ORDER o 08.08.2011 Report has been received from the learned trial court that accused nos. 2 and 3 have been acquitted in cornplaint case no.405212006 under Section l38ll4l, Negotiable Instruments Act pending before the Learned Metropolitan Magistrate.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that since Petitioners have been acquitted in the present case, he does not press the present petition with liberty to file fresh petition seeking quashing of the FIR registered against him.
The present petition dismissed as infructuous with liberly to the petitioners to take appropriate rernedies if so adviced for quashing of FIR.
W4,7L -MUKTA GUPTA, J.
AUGUST 08, 201I. rbt 2011:DHC:8936
JUDGMENT