Full Text
Translation output
#14
% 08.08.2011
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Pawan Narang, APP for the respondent/State.
+Cri.M.C. No.863/2011
Learned APP, on instructions from the 10, submits that charge sheet in case FIR No.269/2008 under Sections 466/467/468/471/1208 IPC P.S.
Subzi Mandi has been filed in the court. In the charge sheet, respondent
Nos. 2 & 3 have been granted anticipatory bail and have been shown in column No.12 as the persons against whom there was insufficient evidence to justify their prosecution. Learned APP, on instruction, submits that even the trial court has not taken cognizance against respondents
No.2 & 3.
In view of the above, I do not find merit in the application for cancelation of anticipatory bail granted to respondents No.2 & 3 vide
, orders dated 05.02.2011 of the learned trial court.
Application is dismissed accordingly.
AUGUST 08,2011 pst
~
(AJIT BHARIHOKE)
JUDGE
2011:DHC:8929
% 08.08.2011
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Pawan Narang, APP for the respondent/State.
+Cri.M.C. No.863/2011
Learned APP, on instructions from the 10, submits that charge sheet in case FIR No.269/2008 under Sections 466/467/468/471/1208 IPC P.S.
Subzi Mandi has been filed in the court. In the charge sheet, respondent
Nos. 2 & 3 have been granted anticipatory bail and have been shown in column No.12 as the persons against whom there was insufficient evidence to justify their prosecution. Learned APP, on instruction, submits that even the trial court has not taken cognizance against respondents
No.2 & 3.
In view of the above, I do not find merit in the application for cancelation of anticipatory bail granted to respondents No.2 & 3 vide
, orders dated 05.02.2011 of the learned trial court.
Application is dismissed accordingly.
AUGUST 08,2011 pst
~
(AJIT BHARIHOKE)
JUDGE
2011:DHC:8929
JUDGMENT