ADM Agro Industries (India) Pvt Ltd v. State & Anr

Delhi High Court · 11 Aug 2011 · 2011:DHC:18901
Mukta Gupta
W.P.(CRL) 123/2011
2011:DHC:18901
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR alleging forgery under Sections 409, 420, 468, and 471 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, subject to payment of costs.

Full Text
Translation output
$#79 HIGH COURT OF DELHI w.P.(cRL) rr23l20rr ADM AGRO INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PV LTD ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Mohit Mathur, Mr. Gautarn Khaitan Mr. Hari Pillai Mr. Manish Ms.Susha and Mr. Adarsh Priyadarshi, Advocates.
VETSUS
STATE & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr.Pawan Shanna, Standing Counsel along with Mr. Dayan I(rishnan, ASC for the State along with Inspector
Vivek Maheshwari, EOW.
Mr. Manish Jain, Adv. for R-2 along with Mr.Vijay Sekhri, Director of the complainant company in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
11.08.201,1 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 15012010 under Sections the complaint of \zlls Tina Finex Ltd., D-13, Chhattarpur Enclave, 100 Ilcet
Road, Mehrauli through its directors Mr. Vrjay Sekhri and Mr. Anil Sekhri.
Briefly the allegations as set out in the FIR. are with regard to forgery w.P.(cRL) r r2s/2011 Page I of 3
2011:DHC:18901 of the minutes of the meeting of the Board. Mr. Vrjay Sekhri, Director of
Respondent No.2/Complainant is present in Court. He states that he is authorized to make statement on behalf of the complainant company. FIe has also placed on record a photocopy of the authorization in this regard, which is marked as Ex.-C. He states that de hors the aveqnenls made by the
Petitioners in the grounds the cornplainant. has settled the matter with the
Petitioners and all other accused, who are mentioned in the abovementioned
FIR and do not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. All civil disputes between the parties have also been resolved. Learned counsel for the Petitioners states that the Petitioners will ratify the resolution taken in the minutes of the rneeting of the Board dated
15tl'Novernber, 2008.
In view of the fact that the parlies have arnicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between thern, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 15012010 under Sections 409/420146814711
W.P.(CRL) 1123/2011
ORDER

1208 IPC registered at PS Economics Offences Wing and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed, subject to costs of Rs.1 lakh each to be paid by the Petitioners and Rs.8 lakhs to be paid by the complainant in lump sum. The costs shall be deposited in the Prirne Minister Relief Fund within two weeks. ' Parties, who have been identified by their reSpective counsels and the Investigating Officer, have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. Petition is disposed of. Order dasti. fl,I^-V,,tr'M / murTA GUPTA.J AUGUST II,2OII tvkmt w.P.(cRL) 1r2s/201r [V,= +r Se onnr) F o, 6'4J or U"U.{ t1 T"^*o Fi'^. * I+g v id,rur\ ted-t* " ZV[."u ht+ * tt Nf' d , ftonr fttr'r,', l""L !"1 ,', \**Lrt. ?. l ( pl , lu 41 ^ Wc[{ r.a^41., ooe4.;" 6TJ, ftfu -":\Jq*W* r;ilt^t) sffion 8d.-r

JUDGMENT