Full Text
Translation output
s-74
* IN THE HIGH COURT
+ w.P.(cRL) 1116120rl
PANKAJ JAIN & ANR
Through
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Petitioner
Mr. Abhinit Das" Adv.
VETSUS
STATE & ANR ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State with Mr. Bharat Singh, SI, P.S.
Gandhi Nagar.
* IN THE HIGH COURT
+ w.P.(cRL) 1116120rl
PANKAJ JAIN & ANR
Through
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Petitioner
Mr. Abhinit Das" Adv.
VETSUS
STATE & ANR ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State with Mr. Bharat Singh, SI, P.S.
Gandhi Nagar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
11.08.2011
Crl.M.A. 943912011
Exernption allowed subject to just exception.
W.P.(CRL) 1116/2011 & Crl.M.A. 9438/2011 (stay)
By this petition the Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 306/07 under
Section 3841170134 IPC on the ground that the parties have amicably settled the rratter. The Petitioner had earlier filed a petition for quashing on the basis of compromise. However, this court disrnissed thc Petition on the ground that though it was a case of rnatrimonial dispute however the parlies w.P.(cRL) 1116/2011 puge I of 2
2011:DHC:18898
')/ have gone to the extent that one lady constable of Ghaziabad posed herself as Sub-Inspector and two sales-tax officers posed as Income-tax Inspectors and went to the house of the girl.
Thus, despite the matter being compromised this Court has declined to quash the FIR.
The present petition also seeks the same relief on the same grounds.
The only thing urged by the learned counsel for the Petitioner is that relevant documents were not filed in the earlier petition. This petition is clearly baned by principle of res-judicata and is not maintainable.
Petition and application are dismissed. xMfu,q-
"MUKTA GUPTA,J
AUGUST 11,201,1
'ga' w.P.(cRL) 1116/2011
2011:DHC:18898
11.08.2011
Crl.M.A. 943912011
Exernption allowed subject to just exception.
W.P.(CRL) 1116/2011 & Crl.M.A. 9438/2011 (stay)
By this petition the Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 306/07 under
Section 3841170134 IPC on the ground that the parties have amicably settled the rratter. The Petitioner had earlier filed a petition for quashing on the basis of compromise. However, this court disrnissed thc Petition on the ground that though it was a case of rnatrimonial dispute however the parlies w.P.(cRL) 1116/2011 puge I of 2
2011:DHC:18898
')/ have gone to the extent that one lady constable of Ghaziabad posed herself as Sub-Inspector and two sales-tax officers posed as Income-tax Inspectors and went to the house of the girl.
Thus, despite the matter being compromised this Court has declined to quash the FIR.
The present petition also seeks the same relief on the same grounds.
The only thing urged by the learned counsel for the Petitioner is that relevant documents were not filed in the earlier petition. This petition is clearly baned by principle of res-judicata and is not maintainable.
Petition and application are dismissed. xMfu,q-
"MUKTA GUPTA,J
AUGUST 11,201,1
'ga' w.P.(cRL) 1116/2011
2011:DHC:18898
JUDGMENT