Full Text
Translation output
$-44 HIGH COURT OF DELHI , W.P.(CRL) 744/2011
VED PRAKASH Petitioner
Through: Mr.Anurag Jain, Advocate
VED PRAKASH Petitioner
Through: Mr.Anurag Jain, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Respondent
Through: Mr.Pawan Sharma Standing counsel with Ms.Laxmi Chauhan Advocate for the State.
Through: Mr.Pawan Sharma Standing counsel with Ms.Laxmi Chauhan Advocate for the State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
11.08.2011 By this petition the Petitioner seeks parole on the ground he has to re establish the ties with the family. On notice being issued, a status report has been filed which states that the mother ofthe Petitioner is suffering from old age ailments and is residing with her another son Kanchan Singh who is looking after her. The Petitioner's wife is also residing with her mother-in- law and brother-in-law.
In view of the fact that the Petitioner's mother is not well and also keeping in view the fact that the Petitioner was earlier granted parole in
April last year for a period of one month which concession he had not misused and surrendered on time, I am inclined to grant parole to the
2011:DHC:18867 V Petitioner. It is, therefore, directed that the Petitioner be released on parole for a period of four weeks on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial
Court/CMM.
Petition is disposed of.
Copy of the order be communicated to the Petitioner through
Superintendent Tihar Jail.
MUKTA GUPTA,J AUGUST 11, 2011 'mr' V, 2011:DHC:18867
11.08.2011 By this petition the Petitioner seeks parole on the ground he has to re establish the ties with the family. On notice being issued, a status report has been filed which states that the mother ofthe Petitioner is suffering from old age ailments and is residing with her another son Kanchan Singh who is looking after her. The Petitioner's wife is also residing with her mother-in- law and brother-in-law.
In view of the fact that the Petitioner's mother is not well and also keeping in view the fact that the Petitioner was earlier granted parole in
April last year for a period of one month which concession he had not misused and surrendered on time, I am inclined to grant parole to the
2011:DHC:18867 V Petitioner. It is, therefore, directed that the Petitioner be released on parole for a period of four weeks on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial
Court/CMM.
Petition is disposed of.
Copy of the order be communicated to the Petitioner through
Superintendent Tihar Jail.
MUKTA GUPTA,J AUGUST 11, 2011 'mr' V, 2011:DHC:18867
JUDGMENT