573cd27c1bbac9c0af1dc8ddd3ebbcaa0b3f3fb59d1b9558f24deb61091a9726

Delhi High Court · 09 Aug 2011 · 2011:DHC:18115
Kailash Gambhir
W.P.(C) No.3516/2011
2011:DHC:18115
other petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after the petitioner’s child was admitted to the school and the petitioner agreed to abide by the Court’s directions restricting his visits to the school.

Full Text
Translation output
#17
% 09.08.2011
Present: Petitioner in person. jvir. Mirza Aslam Beg, Advocate for ivis. Sonia Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.l.
|Vlr. M.Habibuddin, Advocate for respondent No.2.
+W.P.(C) No.3516/2011
* /
J Petitioner present in Court states that his child was admitted
^ in the school pursuant to directions vide order dated 4.7.2011 and since the date of admission his child is now regularly attending his classes. The petitioner further submits that he himself will not visit the school unless he is specifically called by the school authorities.
Vide order dated -^,7.2011 this Court gave directions to the petitioner that he will not visit the school unless he is specifically asked to meet the school authorities.
With the said directions given by this Court vide orders dated
4.7.2011 nothing survives in the present petition. The petition is accordingly disposed of. ^
KAILASH GAMBHIR, J
AUGUST 09, 2011 mm
2011:DHC:18115
JUDGMENT