Full Text
;.'n i.? i:.
')i
I t'
I r"i "
'ra ;
' dr. l.t-'r a ir';' ''
<l rl G'
_.'r' rt i' l4'
I.
:t. a rll
!i:. t.,"
:'l" l.!. I
,).: '' t.:.i
L'.. t;-: i
:\r'1' \ at l frir'l' { ir;' a fi:^: t'.-," l; .r ;"
!,".
.t t,, t. .
.ir
| \!. t'. t.. i'.. it. t
.(: f;" t7 '
.J! r {r,: f! t'
1 .' . t,' i.. i' .
S- 44to48 o/o 09.08.2011
*Present:
(,, Dr. Vijendla Mahndiyan, Mr. Pallavi Awasthi, Mr'
Vineet Mathur & IVIr. Sudesh Mahal & Ms. Pallavi
Awasthi, Advocates for petitioner in W.P.(C) No.1695/2011, r698l20lt &, 28t7 l20lr.
Ml. Nagendra Singh & N/ft. Aslarn Sarnman, Advocates for petitioner in W.P.(C) No.23521201I.
I\4r. Pankaj Bhatia & Mr. Vivek Choudhary, Advs. for petitioner in W.P.(C) No.2509 l20IL
Mt. Jatan Singh, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C)
Nos. 1695/20t1 & W.P.(C) No. 1698/201 1.
Ms. Sweety Manchanda, CGSC for R-l to 3 in W'P.(C)
No.23521201t. r. Neeraj Chaudhari with Mr. Mohit Auluck, W.P.(C) 2509/201,1. & W.r. \" f . i'the counsels have mentioned the"matter.
JUDGMENT
2. The counsel for the respondents states that he has instructions to state that the petitioners ale being ernpanelled and the agreement for ernpanelnent will be executed at Meerut. He thus states that the petitions have becorne infiucfu ous.
3. The counsel for the petitioners states that subject to the respondents being bound by the said statement, the petitions may be disposed of as such' 2011:DHC:18061.f' e ( ii' tr' -,l t.:' !t' t:a b i.jr '!. 1 -Z 9+...l ',s: tt t'" i iit", j". t. i[9].. ir j ' I l': it ir t. I,;.1i'.l.i dj..,{i I l':i, 1t;.,_,j 't,1, r"i I ttr''r., '.a'.'...',.' ii1t' "'.i '' r'1.'" lf "1...4-i'--'' The counsel for the respondents further states that this order U. tt treated as a concession by the respondents to this Court having tenitorial jurisdiction over such matters and be not teated as a precedent.
5. It is so directed.
6. The petitions fl'e disposed of in tenns of the above with no order as to costs.
AUGUST 9,2011 pp..
4. C RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J