Full Text
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.8314/2010 &
CM NOs.10127/11, 21383/2010
Date of Decision: August 11, 2011 P.S. BAHL ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Shanker Raju, Advocate.
Through Mr. M. L. Sharma, Advocate For Respondent No.5.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
JUDGMENT
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No ANIL KUMAR, J. (ORAL)
1. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions from the petitioner, who is present, seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the Tribunal to seek review of impugned order dated 1st December, 2010 with regard to his plea that the original application of the respondent No.5 was barred by time, as the said plea was taken as preliminary objection and was also canvassed before the Tribunal. However, the Tribunal had not decided the same.
2. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for, without prejudice to the other grounds and 2011:DHC:4093-DB WP(C) No.8314/2010 contentions raised by the petitioner in the writ petition which will be open for challenge.
3. The interim order granted by this Court by order dated 14th December, 2010, and any relief availed by the petitioner on account of interim order, however, shall continue for another four weeks. For period after four weeks, it will be open to the petitioner to approach the Tribunal for continuation of interim order and any relief availed by him, in accordance with law.
4. Dasti. ANIL KUMAR, J. SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J. AUGUST 11, 2011 dr