374e500c9f3be84ee7514c21c27029fadc6111e393f5eeebd5c7b7c9ff0239a3

Delhi High Court · 12 Aug 2011 · 2011:DHC:19584
K. Pathak
CS(OS) No. 527/2011
2011:DHC:19584
civil settled

AI Summary

The court passed a compromise decree based on a lawful out-of-court settlement, ordered partial refund of court fees, and disposed of the suit and pending applications accordingly.

Full Text
Translation output
% 12.08.2011
Present: Ms. Sneha Jain, Adv.for the Plaintiff.
Ms. Bijal Trivedi, Adv.for the Defendant.
+ I.A. No. 12742/2011 fu/O 23 R 3 r/w Sec. 151 CPCl in CSfOSl
No. 527/2011
*
Parties have arrived at an out of Court settlement. Terms of settlement have been recorded in paras 2(a) to (j) of the application, which is marked as Mark C-1. The application has not only been signed by the parties but also supported by their respective affidavits.
I have perused the application and find the compromise to be lawful.
Accordingly, a compromise decree is passed in terms of mark C-1 which shall form part of the Decree. Decree sheet be drawn. In terms ofthe compromise,counsel for the defendants has handed over demand draft of?1.5 lakh, a photocopy whereof has been placed on record, to the counsel for the plaintiffs towards satisfaction of Clause
2(d). Since parties have arrived at an out ofcourt settlement,let 50% of the Court fee be refunded to the plaintiffs, in accordance with law.
All interim orders stand vacated and pending applications are disposed of as infructuous. t:K. PATHAK,J.
August 12,2011 ga
2011:DHC:19584
JUDGMENT