9a81d6c325c7ce3f77d1be2e908b10561dd9f65127f09462b2903be5ac1d632f

Delhi High Court · 12 Aug 2011 · 2011:DHC:19583
Pathak J.
CS(OS) No. 526/2011
2011:DHC:19583
civil settled

AI Summary

The court recorded a lawful out-of-court settlement as a compromise decree, ordered partial refund of court fees, and disposed of the suit accordingly.

Full Text
Translation output
d
,?
(l o/o 12.O8.2OIL
Present: Ms. Sneha Jain, Adv. for the Plaintiffs.
Ms. Bijal Trivedi, Adv. for the Defendants.
+ I.A. No. 1274412O11 (q/O 23 R 3 r/w Sec. 151 CPCI in CS(OSI
No.526|2OLL
*
Parties have arrived at an out of Court settlement. Terms of settlement have been recorded in par:a 2 from (a) to 0) of the application, which is marked as Mark C-1. The application has not only been signed by the parties but also supported by their respective affidavits. I have perused the application and find the compromise to be lawful. Accordingly, a compromise decree is passed in terms of mark C-1 which shall form part of the Decree. Decree sheet be drawn. In terms of the compromise, counsel for the defendants has handed over demand draft of T3 lakhs, a photocopy whereof has been placed on record, to the counsel for the plaintiffs towards satisfaction of Clause 2(d). Since parties have arrived at an out of court settlement, let 50% of ttre Court fee be refunded to the plaintiffs, in accordance with law.
'Al1 interim orders stand vacated and pending applications are disposed of as infructuous.
: PATHAK, J.
August L2,zOlL ga
V
2011:DHC:19583
JUDGMENT