Full Text
Translation output
-t HIGH COURT OF DELHI wP(C) No.5824l2011 MANAGING COMMITTEE OF DAISY DALES
SR SEC SCHOOL & ANR ..... Appellants
Through Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gaurang Kant and Mr. Rahul Kumar. Advs.
VETSUS
RAJINDER SINGH MALIK & ORS ..... Respondents
Through None.
SR SEC SCHOOL & ANR ..... Appellants
Through Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gaurang Kant and Mr. Rahul Kumar. Advs.
VETSUS
RAJINDER SINGH MALIK & ORS ..... Respondents
Through None.
CORAM:
\ HoN'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
ORDER o/o 12.08.2011 The present writ petition was called for by us as the same is virtually a part of the lis that has emerged in LPA No.659/2011. Today, while dealing with the LPA No.659/2011 and the application for stay, we have passed the following order:
' "CM No.15106/2011,. LPA No.659/2011 This is an application for condonation of delay of 125 days in filing the appeal. Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, learned senior counsel for the appellants fairly stated that he would not challenge the direction relating to reinstatement and confined the challenge to grant of fulI backwages.
In view of the aforesaid, we are inclined to issue notice on the question of limitation as well as appeal, returnable on 3'o October. 20II.
WP(C) No.5824/2011 Page I of 2 2011:DHC:18257-DB
\ CM No.15105/201 I (stav)
Having heard learned senior counsel for the appellants, it is directed that the appellants shall reinstate the respondent - Rajinder Singf Malik in service by 18th August, 20tL As regards the payment of backwages, the direction issued by the tribunal, which has been concurred by the learned Single judge, stands stayed subject to the appellant's depositing Rs.5 lacs before the
Registry of this Court within a week hence.
If any coercive steps have been taken against the appellant, which would include issuance of warrant of ar arrest, the same shall not be executed.
Once we have passed the aforesaid order, any order or direction issued by the Education Tribunal in Contempt
Application No. I 10/2008 in Appeal No. 18/1998 shall remain staved."
In view of the aforesaid order passed in LPA No.659/2011, nothing further remains to be adjudicated. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed. of.
The Registry is to take note of the same. hn'nl
CHIEF JUSTICE t AUGUST t2o20ll dk ,-a '/-C -l/r
L - f ( SANJIV KIIANNA. J WP(C) No.5824/201I 2011:DHC:18257-DB
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
ORDER o/o 12.08.2011 The present writ petition was called for by us as the same is virtually a part of the lis that has emerged in LPA No.659/2011. Today, while dealing with the LPA No.659/2011 and the application for stay, we have passed the following order:
' "CM No.15106/2011,. LPA No.659/2011 This is an application for condonation of delay of 125 days in filing the appeal. Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, learned senior counsel for the appellants fairly stated that he would not challenge the direction relating to reinstatement and confined the challenge to grant of fulI backwages.
In view of the aforesaid, we are inclined to issue notice on the question of limitation as well as appeal, returnable on 3'o October. 20II.
WP(C) No.5824/2011 Page I of 2 2011:DHC:18257-DB
\ CM No.15105/201 I (stav)
Having heard learned senior counsel for the appellants, it is directed that the appellants shall reinstate the respondent - Rajinder Singf Malik in service by 18th August, 20tL As regards the payment of backwages, the direction issued by the tribunal, which has been concurred by the learned Single judge, stands stayed subject to the appellant's depositing Rs.5 lacs before the
Registry of this Court within a week hence.
If any coercive steps have been taken against the appellant, which would include issuance of warrant of ar arrest, the same shall not be executed.
Once we have passed the aforesaid order, any order or direction issued by the Education Tribunal in Contempt
Application No. I 10/2008 in Appeal No. 18/1998 shall remain staved."
In view of the aforesaid order passed in LPA No.659/2011, nothing further remains to be adjudicated. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed. of.
The Registry is to take note of the same. hn'nl
CHIEF JUSTICE t AUGUST t2o20ll dk ,-a '/-C -l/r
L - f ( SANJIV KIIANNA. J WP(C) No.5824/201I 2011:DHC:18257-DB
JUDGMENT