Full Text
Translation output
t
A-46 o/o L2.OB.20LL
Present : Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. S.N. Prashar, Advocate for the respondent No'
Respondent No. L.
+MAC Appeal No. 3712O1L
*
The Award impugned is the Award dated 03.09.20L0 vide which compensation in the sum of Rs. 2,79,8401- had been awarded in favour of the claimants. Admittedly, mandatory provisions of
Section L7O of the Motor Vehicles Act have not been complied with; no pennission has been taken by the appellant for preferring this appeal although the appeal has made a challenge even on the quantum of the compensation. Appeal is not maintainable; it is I
I accordingly dismissed. I I tt statutory amount be released in favour o7the appellant. I tr'l
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
AUGUST 12,2OTT rb
Jut- F
@/r'1Lou/*
2011:DHC:15319
A-46 o/o L2.OB.20LL
Present : Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. S.N. Prashar, Advocate for the respondent No'
Respondent No. L.
+MAC Appeal No. 3712O1L
*
The Award impugned is the Award dated 03.09.20L0 vide which compensation in the sum of Rs. 2,79,8401- had been awarded in favour of the claimants. Admittedly, mandatory provisions of
Section L7O of the Motor Vehicles Act have not been complied with; no pennission has been taken by the appellant for preferring this appeal although the appeal has made a challenge even on the quantum of the compensation. Appeal is not maintainable; it is I
I accordingly dismissed. I I tt statutory amount be released in favour o7the appellant. I tr'l
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
AUGUST 12,2OTT rb
Jut- F
@/r'1Lou/*
2011:DHC:15319
JUDGMENT