Full Text
LA.APP. 7.20/2006 INDRAWATI Appellant
Through: Mr.S.Chaturvedi and Mr.R.S.Dalal, Advocate
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sanjay Pathak, Advocate for UOI.
LADO DEVI Appellant Mr.R.S.DaIaI, Advocates
-• . .
. with Mr.Sanjay Pathak, LA.APP. 722/2006 JOGINDER Appellant
Mr.R.S.Dalal, Advocates
2011:DHC:13270
DALEL SINGH Appellant Mr.R.S.DaIaI, Advocates
• Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Sr.Advocate
VIRENDER @ RAGHVENDER Appellant
Through: Mr.Deepak Khosla and Mr.S.S.Rana, Advocates
RANDHIR Appellant
SANDEEP Appellant, •
• Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Sr.Adv1ocate
• with Mr.Sanjay Páthak, LA.APP. 175/2010
RAMA NAND Appellant
RAMBIR SINGH . Appellant
RAMPHAL . Appellant
BALBIR SING H Appellant
Through: Mr. Deepak Khosla and
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar,. Sr.Advocate
• I..A.APP. 189/2010
PEHLAD SINGH .... Appellant
RAM RATI (DECEASED) THR. LRS .....Appellant
Through: Mr.Sanjáy Poddar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sanjay. Pathak, LA.APP. 230/2010
RAJBIR SINGH Appellant
JAS WANT SING H Appellant
• Through: Mr. Deepak Khosla and
• Mr.S.S.Rana, Advocates
'T
SATYAVIR SINGH DECD THR LRS .....Appellant
UNION OF INDIA
Through
Through Appellant Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Sr.Advocte with Mr.Sanjay Pathak, Advocate for UOI.
Respondents Ms.Amita Singh, Advocate for DDA
DEVENDER Appellant
12.08.2011 Above captioned appeals and cross objections if, any, pertain to acquisition of land in the revenue estate of village Holarnbi
Khurd which were acquired pursuant to a notification dated
15.11.1996 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act.
Pertaining to the same notification and relating to adjoining village fair market value determined by this Court in the decision reported as 2006 (VI) AD (Delhi) 13 Ga/ra/5/ncih Vs.
UO/ has been held to be 9,76,121/- per acre for category A land for 9,51,121/- per acre for category B land.
ORDER
3. The appeals stand disposed of decreeing that where the Court has awarded the compensation as aforesaid the Said appeal would stand dismissed without any. orders as to costs and in such appeals where the Reference Court has determined a fair market value less than 9,76,121/- for category A and. 9,51,121/- for category B, the appellants or the cross objectors as the case may be, would be entitled to compensation at the said rate and needless to state on the enhanced compensation statutory benefits as per the Land Acquisition Act 1894 as interpreted in the decision reported as 93 (2001) DLT 569 Sunder vs. UQI shall be granted. In cases where there is delay in filing the appeal and delay has been condoned, on the enhanced compensation interest would not be paid for the period of delay. Proportionate costs as well.. C.M. No.8313/2011 in LA.Ar.No.238/2011 (Stay): Since the appeal is being heard for final disposal, instant application seeking stay of operation of impugned decree is dismissed. C.M. No.8314/2011 in LA.Arp.No.238/2011(Dela'/) For the reasons stated in the.application, the delay of 70 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. AUGUST 12, 2011 mm S