Rajesh Aggarwal v. State of NCT of Delhi

1. By the instant petition the petitioner has challenged the order dated 14.06.2011 passed by learned ASJ 01 (N)/Delhi by which the petitioner was admitted to bail with the condition that the he shall deposit the amount of T 1 lakh within 20 days from 2011:DHC:9245 the date of his release with the 10 who shall deposit the amount in the malkhana.

2. Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that he has already deposited T 50,000/- with the 10 on 23.07.2011 in view of the modification order dated 04.07.2011.

3 Ld. counsel for the petitioner further submits that he is ready to deposit the remaining amount off 50,000/- on or before 05.09.2011. ^ 4. His prayer is accepted and further time is granted.

5. Ld. counsel for the petitioner pointed out that the amount which has been deposited with the 10 in the malkhana and the remaining amount of T50,000/- which is to be deposited, would not incur any interest. Therefore, the total amount of T 1 lakh be converted into FDR.

6. I find force in the submission of the Id. counsel for the S petitioner, therefore, Idirect the 10, SI Dharamender Kumar, who is personally present in the Court, that after receiving the remaining amount of f 50,000/- from the petitioner, he shall withdraw the previously deposited f 50,000/- from the malkhana and convert the total amount of f 1 lakh into FDR in the name of District and Sessions Judge, Delhi, initially for a period of 8 years. which shall be renewed thereafter periodically, if required.

7. Dasti.

8. CRL.M.G. 2674/2011 is allowed in the aforesaid terms. CrI M.A. No.9510/2011 Since the petition is disposed of, this application has become infructuous. Dismissed as being infructuous.

SURESH KAITJ AUGUST 12, 2011 RS