Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 806/2011
SHREE BHAGWAN ..... Petitioner
Through Ms. Anjana Goswami, proxy counsel.
W.P.(CRL) 806/2011
SHREE BHAGWAN ..... Petitioner
Through Ms. Anjana Goswami, proxy counsel.
VERSUS
STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent
CORAM:
Through Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State with Inspector Ravi Kant.
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
16.08.2011 By this petition, the Petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to distribute his ancestral properties amongst his children and also to re- establish ties with the family.
On a notice being issued, a status report has been filed. The same is taken on record. As per the status report, the wife of the Petitioner along
1,/' with her two sons is residing at the native place in District Rohtak, Haryana.
The status report also shows that the Petitioner's family is having properties, which are being looked after by Petitioner's younger son, who is living with his mother.
Be that as it may, the Petitioner has been earlier granted parole in the years 2009 and 2010. There is no allegation that he misused the concession
2011:DHC:18876 r ofparole granted to him when he was released on the last occasion.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it to be a fit case for grant of parole to the Petitioner. It is, therefore, directed that the Petitioner be released on parole for four weeks on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/CMM.
The petition stands disposed of.
Copy of the order be communicated to the Petitioner through
Superintendent, Tihar Jail.
AUGUST 16, 2011 vkm 2011:DHC:18876
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
16.08.2011 By this petition, the Petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to distribute his ancestral properties amongst his children and also to re- establish ties with the family.
On a notice being issued, a status report has been filed. The same is taken on record. As per the status report, the wife of the Petitioner along
1,/' with her two sons is residing at the native place in District Rohtak, Haryana.
The status report also shows that the Petitioner's family is having properties, which are being looked after by Petitioner's younger son, who is living with his mother.
Be that as it may, the Petitioner has been earlier granted parole in the years 2009 and 2010. There is no allegation that he misused the concession
2011:DHC:18876 r ofparole granted to him when he was released on the last occasion.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it to be a fit case for grant of parole to the Petitioner. It is, therefore, directed that the Petitioner be released on parole for four weeks on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/CMM.
The petition stands disposed of.
Copy of the order be communicated to the Petitioner through
Superintendent, Tihar Jail.
AUGUST 16, 2011 vkm 2011:DHC:18876
JUDGMENT