Full Text
Translation output
{
2# $_
* IN TIIE HIGH COURT QF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ w.P.(cRL) 467120rt soNIA @ SANIYA SALIM & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through: None.
VETSUS
STATE & ORS ""'ResPondents
Through:Vlr.HarshPrabhakar,Advocatefor
Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel with ASI Mohd. Salim.
Ms. APrajita, Advocate for
Respondent No. 4.
2# $_
* IN TIIE HIGH COURT QF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ w.P.(cRL) 467120rt soNIA @ SANIYA SALIM & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through: None.
VETSUS
STATE & ORS ""'ResPondents
Through:Vlr.HarshPrabhakar,Advocatefor
Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel with ASI Mohd. Salim.
Ms. APrajita, Advocate for
Respondent No. 4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA oh 16.08.20L1
By this petition the Petitioners have sought protection on the ground that they have married of their own free will contrary to the wishes of
Respondent Nos. 4 to 7.
The petitioners had appeared before this Court on the first date of
.:2 hearing, that is, l't April, 2OIL Today neither they nor anybody on their
J behalf has appeared before the court. An application was filed by
Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 also to meet the Petitioner No. t however, notice could not be served on the Petitioners as they were not found residing at the address and matter was fixed for today'
W.P.(CRL) 467/2011 Page I of 2
2011:DHC:18843
\*-
Learned proxy counsel for the learned Standing Counsel placed on record the order dated 3'd June, 20II passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in a writ of habeas corpus filed by Respondent No. 4 wherein the Petitioner No. 1 appeared and stated that she had married Petitioner NO. 2 of her own free will and she is major. Learned proxy counsel also informs that the Petitioners are not staying at the address given and thus the SHO could not provide them the security at that place.
Since none is present on behalf of the Petitioners, it appears that they are not interested in prosecuting the present petition any further.
Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
[y^Xf//-f(*
' MUKTA GUPTA, J. v
AUGUST l6,20tl tvnt w.P.(cRL) 467/2011
2011:DHC:18843
By this petition the Petitioners have sought protection on the ground that they have married of their own free will contrary to the wishes of
Respondent Nos. 4 to 7.
The petitioners had appeared before this Court on the first date of
.:2 hearing, that is, l't April, 2OIL Today neither they nor anybody on their
J behalf has appeared before the court. An application was filed by
Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 also to meet the Petitioner No. t however, notice could not be served on the Petitioners as they were not found residing at the address and matter was fixed for today'
W.P.(CRL) 467/2011 Page I of 2
2011:DHC:18843
\*-
Learned proxy counsel for the learned Standing Counsel placed on record the order dated 3'd June, 20II passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in a writ of habeas corpus filed by Respondent No. 4 wherein the Petitioner No. 1 appeared and stated that she had married Petitioner NO. 2 of her own free will and she is major. Learned proxy counsel also informs that the Petitioners are not staying at the address given and thus the SHO could not provide them the security at that place.
Since none is present on behalf of the Petitioners, it appears that they are not interested in prosecuting the present petition any further.
Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
[y^Xf//-f(*
' MUKTA GUPTA, J. v
AUGUST l6,20tl tvnt w.P.(cRL) 467/2011
2011:DHC:18843
JUDGMENT