Ashok Kumar Thakur v. State of Bihar

Supreme Court of India · 01 Dec 2008
Tarun Chatterjee; V. S. Sirpurkar
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1942 OF 2008
criminal appeal_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's non-reasoned order rejecting a Section 482 CrPC application and remanded the matter for fresh disposal with a reasoned order.

Full Text
Translation output
NON-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1942 OF 2008
(Arising out of SLP(Crl.)No. 2337 of 2007)
Ashok Kumar Thakur@Ashok Kumar …Appellant
VERSUS
State of Bihar & Ors. …Respondents
ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 8th of December, 2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Criminal Misc. NO. 10662 of 2004, by which the learned Judge of the High Court had rejected an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short, ‘the Code’).

3. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the impugned order and the materials on record including the application under Section 482 of the Code.

4. In our view, the High Court had passed the impugned order without applying its mind and without passing a reasoned and speaking order.

5. In this view of the matter only, we set aside the impugned order and the matter is remitted back to the High Court for fresh disposal after giving hearing to the parties and after passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law.

6. It is expected that the High Court shall decide the said application under Section 482 of the Code within two months from the date of supply of a copy of this order to it without giving any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties.

7. The impugned order is thus set aside and the appeal is allowed to the extent indicated above. There will be no order as to costs. …………..………………J. [TARUN CHATTERJEE ] NEW DELHI: …...………………………J. December 01, 2008 [V.S.SIRPURKAR]