Manish Gupta v. National Insurance Company Limited

Delhi High Court · 25 Oct 2024 · 2024:DHC:8378
Manoj Jain
CM(M) 2098/2024
2024:DHC:8378
civil appeal_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for lack of territorial jurisdiction, directing the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional High Court where the cause of action arose.

Full Text
Translation output
CM(M) 2098/2024 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 25th October, 2024
CM(M) 2098/2024
MANISH GUPTA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Yuvraj Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate.
VERSUS
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Anand Shankar
WITH
Mr. Sachin Mintri and Mr. Parvez Rahman, Advocates.
Ms. Meenakshi Midha, Ms. Samiksha Gupta, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
JUDGMENT
(oral)
CM(M) 2098/2024 & CM APPL. 63310/2024

1. The present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging order dated 27.10.2023 passed by learned National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (in short „NCDRC‟) in First Appeal No. 524/2018.

2. The above matter was filed before learned NCDRC impugning order dated 22.02.2018 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chhattisgarh in Complaint No. 09/2012.

3. Since the entire cause of action pertaining to the present subject matter CM(M) 2098/2024 2 has arisen within the jurisdiction of Chhattisgarh High Court, relying upon judgment dated 04.03.2024 passed by Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Siddhartha S Mookerjee vs. Madhab Chand Mitter, Civil Appeal Nos. 3915-16/2024, learned counsel for petitioner prays that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach said jurisdictional High Court.

4. This Court has gone through the above said order wherein the Hon‟ble Supreme Court has, very categorically, observed that merely because NCDRC had allowed petition, the jurisdiction would not vest with Delhi High Court and observing that since the cause of action had arisen in Kolkata and the matter had been dealt with by the State Commission of West Bengal, it was held that the jurisdiction of High Court of Calcutta should have been invoked.

5. Moreover, this Court has already vide order dated 12.09.2024 passed in General Manager, Punjab National Bank and Others vs. Rohit Malhotra: (2024) SCC OnLine Del 6415 observed that in view of Siddhartha S Mookerjee (supra), any such petitioner should go to the “jurisdictional High Court”.

6. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Liberty, as prayed for, is granted.

7. It is, however, made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion, whatsoever, over the merits of the case.

JUDGE OCTOBER 25, 2024