Bharat Bhargava v. NSIC

Delhi High Court · 16 Aug 2011 · 2011:DHC:9255
Suresh Kail
CRL.M.C. 1214/2011 & CRL.M.A.4434/2011
2011:DHC:9255
criminal appeal_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous petition after non-compliance with an order to file a certified document, imposing costs as a condition for an earlier extension.

Full Text
Translation output
{ $-2 HIGH COURT OF DELHI CRL.M .C. L2L4l20l1 & Crl.M.A.4434l20tt
BHARAT BHARGAVA & ANR ..... PCtitiONCr
Through Mr. A N Tiwari, Advocate
VERSUS
NSIC & ORS ..... Respondents
Through Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for State
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAlr
ORDER o/o 16.08.2011
JUDGMENT

1. Vide order dated L[9].04.2011 the petitioner was directed to place on record the certified copy of Form 32 issued by Registrar of Companies, Delhi. At his.request the matter was re-notified on 24.05.20LL. E 2. The position remained the same. Therefore, 4 weeks time was further granted to the petitioner. Even today the petitioner has not complied with the order dated 19.04.2011.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client is an NRI who is settled in the United States, therefore, he 2011:DHC:9255 '1 further needs 4 weeks time to file the same.

4. The request of the learned counsel is accepted, subject to the cost of Rs.10,000/- to be paid in favour of the Delhi Police Welfare Fund, within one week and proof of the same shall also be placed on record.

5. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition. Request is allowed.

6. At his request CRL.M.C. 121412011 & Crl.M.A.443412011 is dismissed as withdrawn.