AMARNATH NAGPAL ..... Petitioner Through Mr. N. Kinra, Advocate. v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....

Delhi High Court · 17 Aug 2011 · 2011:DHC:18124-DB
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE; HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA; AUGUST 17, 2011 VKR .,-- ;jh-:/'~ CHIEF JUSTICE; ~~·Jfc_ SANJIV KHANNA, J.
2011:DHC:18124-DB
administrative appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of two writ petitions against the Delhi Development Authority, permitting the petitioners to intervene in an earlier pending petition covering the same controversy.

Full Text
Translation output
-, -~· ./ 8&9.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 4886/2011
AMARNATH NAGPAL ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. N. Kinra, Advocate.
VERSUS
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Rajiv Bansal & Mr. Rahul Bhandari, Advocates.
~P.(C) 5103/2011 P.K.CHOUDHARY ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. N. Kinra, Advocate.
VERSUS
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Rajiv Bansal & Mr. Rahul Bhandari, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
17.08.2011 The controversy involved in these cases is covered by the controversy in W.P. (C) No. 8765/2009. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to file an application for intervention in the said case to raise his grievance as well as assist the Court.
2011:DHC:18124-DB With the aforesaid obseNation and liberty, the writ ) petitions stand disposed of.
AUGUST 17, 2011 VKR .,-- ;jh-:/'~ CHIEF JUSTICE
~~·Jfc_ SANJIV KHANNA, J.
2011:DHC:18124-DB
JUDGMENT