Full Text
Translation output
lr s-l7 HIGH COURT OF DELHI CRL.M.C .3s4120t0 & Crl.M.A. 594512010
RAJEEV BHALLA & ANR. ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Sameer Chandra, Mr. S.C' Mohan Mehta, Advs. with Petitioners in person.
VETSUS
STATE OF DELHI ""' ResPondent
Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for State with IVIr. Abhishek Singh, SI, P'S'
Nizammudin.
R-3 in Person.
RAJEEV BHALLA & ANR. ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Sameer Chandra, Mr. S.C' Mohan Mehta, Advs. with Petitioners in person.
VETSUS
STATE OF DELHI ""' ResPondent
Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for State with IVIr. Abhishek Singh, SI, P'S'
Nizammudin.
R-3 in Person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
24.08.2011 By this petition the Petitioners sepk quashing of FIR No. 66012007 under Section 3 4Zl 380I 448I 452134 IPC registered at P. S. Hazrat Nizamuddin on the complaint of Respondent No.2 a resident of Nepal who was working as a domestic help with the Respondent No.3.
The allegations as set out in complaint were that the Petitioners who are the son and daughter-in-Iaw of the landlord restrained the Respondent
No.2 in the bathroom and tried to remove the goods from the tenancy in possession of the Respondent No.3. The parties have amicably settled the t o
CRL.M.C. 3s4/2010 page I of 3 2011:DHC:10654 I
J lt matter. The said settlement was recorded in a civil suit filed by the father of t/
Petitioner No.1 and the Respondent No.3. As per the terms of settlement recorded vide order dated 17th April, 2009 the Respondent No.3 withdrew the suit and stated that he will also withdraw the abovementioned FIR lodged against the Petitioners. Statement of the father of Petitioner was also recorded wherein he has stated that he would also not press the claims in the suit filed by him. The property in question has since been vacated by the
Respondent No.3. The Petitioners who are present in person states that they have no claim left with the Respondent No.3 and will file no other proceedings against him.
Respondent No.3 who is present in Court and is identified by the
Investigating Officer states that in view of the settlement between the parties he does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
' In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings cRL.M.C.3s4/2010 page 2 0f 3 l
{y' Ir pursuant thereto. | 7 Consequently, FIR No. 660/2007 under.section 34213801 4481452134
IPC registered at P.S. HazralNizamuddin and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
The petition and the pending application are disposed of. Order dasti. q'h,.X-h /4ek
- [t MUKTA GUPTA,J AUGUST 24,2011 'gu' Jt Wfbtrlr&r^t^l ffi^
(kr i{rLc}-rruS'ff)
CRL:M.C. 3s4/2010 \ \t*\ \A 1. e i)* tn *' \Y . No*t
P/v 0,9t*'
24.08.2011 By this petition the Petitioners sepk quashing of FIR No. 66012007 under Section 3 4Zl 380I 448I 452134 IPC registered at P. S. Hazrat Nizamuddin on the complaint of Respondent No.2 a resident of Nepal who was working as a domestic help with the Respondent No.3.
The allegations as set out in complaint were that the Petitioners who are the son and daughter-in-Iaw of the landlord restrained the Respondent
No.2 in the bathroom and tried to remove the goods from the tenancy in possession of the Respondent No.3. The parties have amicably settled the t o
CRL.M.C. 3s4/2010 page I of 3 2011:DHC:10654 I
J lt matter. The said settlement was recorded in a civil suit filed by the father of t/
Petitioner No.1 and the Respondent No.3. As per the terms of settlement recorded vide order dated 17th April, 2009 the Respondent No.3 withdrew the suit and stated that he will also withdraw the abovementioned FIR lodged against the Petitioners. Statement of the father of Petitioner was also recorded wherein he has stated that he would also not press the claims in the suit filed by him. The property in question has since been vacated by the
Respondent No.3. The Petitioners who are present in person states that they have no claim left with the Respondent No.3 and will file no other proceedings against him.
Respondent No.3 who is present in Court and is identified by the
Investigating Officer states that in view of the settlement between the parties he does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
' In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings cRL.M.C.3s4/2010 page 2 0f 3 l
{y' Ir pursuant thereto. | 7 Consequently, FIR No. 660/2007 under.section 34213801 4481452134
IPC registered at P.S. HazralNizamuddin and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
The petition and the pending application are disposed of. Order dasti. q'h,.X-h /4ek
- [t MUKTA GUPTA,J AUGUST 24,2011 'gu' Jt Wfbtrlr&r^t^l ffi^
(kr i{rLc}-rruS'ff)
CRL:M.C. 3s4/2010 \ \t*\ \A 1. e i)* tn *' \Y . No*t
P/v 0,9t*'
JUDGMENT