Amiruddin v. State

Delhi High Court · 24 Aug 2011 · 2011:DHC:16890-DB
Badar Durrez Ahmed; Veena Birbal
W.P.(CRL) 1082/2011
2011:DHC:16890-DB
family petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court verified the age and marriage of Mahreen, found her to be a major who chose to live with her husband, and disposed of the writ petition without further directions.

Full Text
Translation output
v
$- 13
* IN THE HIGH COURT
+ w.P.(cRL) r082t20rr
AMIRUDDIN
Through
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Petitioner
Mr Haneef Mohammad, Advocate e
VCTSUS
STATE ..... Respondent
Through Mr Pawan Sharma, St. Counsel for
State.
Mr Sanjay Kumar, Advocate for
Mahreen.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL o/, 24.08.2011
Mr Pawan Sharma informs us that insofar as the age of the petitioner's daughter Mahreen is concerned, they have verified from the first school attended by her. namely, J.D. Tytler School, New Rajinder
School, Delhi, that her recorded date of binh is 20.08.1993. Insofar as the nikahnama is concerned that also stands verified. accordine to the learned counsel for the State inasmuch as the statement of the Qazi as well as the witness and the vakeel have been recorded and all of them have confirmed that the nikah took place. In any event, Mahreen is now over 18 yla15 of age and she has decided to stay with her husband Mohd.
Vaseem. [n these circumstances, no further directions are necessary. The writ petit on stands disposed of. The Station House Officer of Police
2011:DHC:16890-DB
,\
Station Sadar Bazaar is directed to ensure that no untoward incident takes place. Dasti.
IM*'J'
BADAR DURREZ AHMBD, J lt
Vez-r'-s
VEENA BIRBAL:J._--
AUGUST 24,2OII srb
It.
2011:DHC:16890-DB
JUDGMENT