Full Text
Translation output
l_ a-
\ o
45# $-
* IN THE HIGH COI]RT
+ CRL.M.C.2787l20ll
OMPRAKASH & ANR
Through:
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Petitioners
Vfu. Krishan Kumar and IVk. Lalit
Kaushik, Advocates with Petitioners in person.
VETSUS
STATE & ANR ..... ResPondents
Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP with SI Ram
Pal, PS Uttam Nagar, Delhi.
I\zlr. Lalit Kuamr Dixit, Advocate for
Respondent No. 2 along with
Complainant and his daughter in person.
\ o
45# $-
* IN THE HIGH COI]RT
+ CRL.M.C.2787l20ll
OMPRAKASH & ANR
Through:
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Petitioners
Vfu. Krishan Kumar and IVk. Lalit
Kaushik, Advocates with Petitioners in person.
VETSUS
STATE & ANR ..... ResPondents
Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP with SI Ram
Pal, PS Uttam Nagar, Delhi.
I\zlr. Lalit Kuamr Dixit, Advocate for
Respondent No. 2 along with
Complainant and his daughter in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GT]PTA
2s.08.2011
Crl.
M.A. No. 9966/201.L (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Crt. M.C. No. 278712011
This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 7212002 under Sections
498N5041506/323134 IPC and Sections 314 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, z11zregistered at PS Timarpur, Delhi on the complaint of father of the wife of the Petitioner No. 2.
The Complainant/Respondent No. 2 is present in person. The
Complainant states that the disputes between the Petitioner No. 1 and his
CRL.M.C. 2787/2011 n
"t"i
2011:DHC:10782
"2
1/ daughter have been amicably resolved and they are living together aq husband and wife. In view of the fact that the disputes between the parties have been iesolved the Complainant/Respondent No. 2 does not want to pursue the present complaint.
The wife of the Petitioner No. 1 and the daughter of the Complainant is also present in Court. She also states that the matter between her and
Petitioner No. t has been settled and they are living together.
Since the parties have amicably resolved their difference and the pendency of the present proceedings will bring further acrimony and disharmony between the two, it would be in the interest of justice if the present FIR is quashed.
Accordingly, FIR No. 7212002 under Sections 4984/5 0415061323134
IPC and Sections 314 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 2002 registered at PS
Timarpur, Delhi and the proceedings pursuant thereto are quashed.
Parties, who are identified by their respective counsels, have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this
Court.
Petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
M-
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
\ tl! r\A r^#-*w
',iott'F^ry*t{Y"Y
&r$rt . t,L .. tktnY"
" a"'v/"'i
)&trEI*,.g,,.
- /r v---r- ./tl tf t z tanll
'^/ - \rnr-\Q-l .
2011:DHC:10782
2s.08.2011
Crl.
M.A. No. 9966/201.L (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Crt. M.C. No. 278712011
This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 7212002 under Sections
498N5041506/323134 IPC and Sections 314 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, z11zregistered at PS Timarpur, Delhi on the complaint of father of the wife of the Petitioner No. 2.
The Complainant/Respondent No. 2 is present in person. The
Complainant states that the disputes between the Petitioner No. 1 and his
CRL.M.C. 2787/2011 n
"t"i
2011:DHC:10782
"2
1/ daughter have been amicably resolved and they are living together aq husband and wife. In view of the fact that the disputes between the parties have been iesolved the Complainant/Respondent No. 2 does not want to pursue the present complaint.
The wife of the Petitioner No. 1 and the daughter of the Complainant is also present in Court. She also states that the matter between her and
Petitioner No. t has been settled and they are living together.
Since the parties have amicably resolved their difference and the pendency of the present proceedings will bring further acrimony and disharmony between the two, it would be in the interest of justice if the present FIR is quashed.
Accordingly, FIR No. 7212002 under Sections 4984/5 0415061323134
IPC and Sections 314 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 2002 registered at PS
Timarpur, Delhi and the proceedings pursuant thereto are quashed.
Parties, who are identified by their respective counsels, have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this
Court.
Petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
M-
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
\ tl! r\A r^#-*w
',iott'F^ry*t{Y"Y
&r$rt . t,L .. tktnY"
" a"'v/"'i
)&trEI*,.g,,.
- /r v---r- ./tl tf t z tanll
'^/ - \rnr-\Q-l .
2011:DHC:10782
JUDGMENT