Full Text
Translation output
Crl.A. No.993/2009 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Hearing: 11th August, 2011
Date of Decision: 17th August, 2011
Date of Hearing: 11th August, 2011
Date of Decision: 17th August, 2011
CRL. A. 993/2009
PANKAJ CHAUDHARY ...APPELLANT
Through: Mr. Gopi Chand, Advocate with Appellant present in JC.
PANKAJ CHAUDHARY ...APPELLANT
Through: Mr. Gopi Chand, Advocate with Appellant present in JC.
VERSUS
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ...RESPONDENT
Through: Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for the State.
Through: Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for the State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL
JUDGMENT
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Order? No
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No
3. Whether the Order should be reported in the Digest? No
JUDGMENT
G.P. MITTAL, J.
1. The present appeal is partly allowed in terms of the judgment passed today in Crl.A.No.813/2011 tilted as ‘State vs. Pankaj Chaudhary’.
2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE (S. RAVINDRA BHAT)
JUDGE AUGUST 17, 2011 vk