Full Text
Translation output
$-89 HIGH COURT OF DELHI w.P.(cRL) 2l20rr JAI BHAGWAN ..... Petitioner
Mis. Charu Verma, Adv.
Through VETSUS STATE ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, SC for State with
Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Adv. with Mr. Manoj Sharma, SI, P.S. Narela.
Through
Mis. Charu Verma, Adv.
Through VETSUS STATE ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, SC for State with
Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Adv. with Mr. Manoj Sharma, SI, P.S. Narela.
Through
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA oh
18.08.2011 By this petition the Petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to reconstruct the house. On a notice being issued status reporl has been filed as per which enquires were conducted and statement of two people living in the neighbourhood were recorded who stated that the house of the
Petitioner does not require arly repairheconstruction. Further learned
Standing Counsel for the State has placed on record the list of involvement of the Petitioner. As per the list of involvement, the Petitioner has been convicted in a case under Section 302 IPC registered at P.S. Narela and 7-8 w.P.(cRL) 2/2011 page I of 2
2011:DHC:18822 :r. matters relating to offence$ under the Excise Act are pending against him.
He has been acquitted in 8 other cases.
Be that as it may, since the grounds stated in the parole petition are not found to be genuine, I am not inclined to grant parole to the Petitioner at this stage.
Petition is dismissed.
$*fL , MUKTA GUPTA,J AUGUST L8, 2011 'ga' w.P.(cRL) 2/2011
2011:DHC:18822
18.08.2011 By this petition the Petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to reconstruct the house. On a notice being issued status reporl has been filed as per which enquires were conducted and statement of two people living in the neighbourhood were recorded who stated that the house of the
Petitioner does not require arly repairheconstruction. Further learned
Standing Counsel for the State has placed on record the list of involvement of the Petitioner. As per the list of involvement, the Petitioner has been convicted in a case under Section 302 IPC registered at P.S. Narela and 7-8 w.P.(cRL) 2/2011 page I of 2
2011:DHC:18822 :r. matters relating to offence$ under the Excise Act are pending against him.
He has been acquitted in 8 other cases.
Be that as it may, since the grounds stated in the parole petition are not found to be genuine, I am not inclined to grant parole to the Petitioner at this stage.
Petition is dismissed.
$*fL , MUKTA GUPTA,J AUGUST L8, 2011 'ga' w.P.(cRL) 2/2011
2011:DHC:18822
JUDGMENT