14. / + / CRL.M.C. 4150/2009 15. ANNAPUR,NA INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES LTD & ORS...... Petitioners versus Through: Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Adv. for Mr. Ashish Midha, Advocate REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES..... Respondent Through: Mr.Manmeet Singh, Adv. + CRL.M.C. 4151/2009

14. / + / CRL.M.C. 4150/2009 15. ANNAPUR,NA INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES LTD & ORS...... Petitioners versus Through: Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Adv. for Mr. Ashish Midha, Advocate REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES..... Respondent Through: Mr.Manmeet Singh, Adv. + CRL.M.C. 4151/2009 ANNAPURNA INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES LTD & ORS...... Petitioners versus Through: Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Adv. for Mr. Ashish Midha, Advocate REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES..... Respondent Through: Mr.Manmeet Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA ORDER 29.08.2011 Though these two matters were referred by the learned Single Judge after noticing conflicts in the decisions rendered in Anita Chadha v. petitioner submitted that he has instructions not to press the petitions 2011:DHC:9655 • preferred under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Learned counsel for the respondent fairly stated that he has no objection for the withdrawal of the petitions but the issue of law be kept open. Needless to emphasise, when the petitioner expressed its intention to withdraw the petitions, this Court need not proceed to answer the reference as that would be a totally academic exercise. In view of the aforesaid and keeping the controversy that has been referred by the learned Single Judge open, the petitions are permitted to be withdrawn.

AUGUST 29, 2011 pk ~':"' CHIEF JUSTICE ~-·J(c.....__ SANJIV KHANNA, J