Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RC.REV. 318/2011
Petitioner SYED MOHD IQBAL
Through: Mr. Ratnesh Bansal, Advocate.
RC.REV. 318/2011
Petitioner SYED MOHD IQBAL
Through: Mr. Ratnesh Bansal, Advocate.
VERSUS
NADEEM
Through: None.
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN
18.08.2011 Respondent CM No. 15315/2011 Exemption as prayed for in this application is granted subject to all just exceptions.The application stands disposedof.
18.08.2011 Respondent CM No. 15315/2011 Exemption as prayed for in this application is granted subject to all just exceptions.The application stands disposedof.
RC.REV. 318/2011 .
The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Additional Rent
Controller whereby his eviction petition under Section 14(l)(e) oftheDelhi Rent Control
Act has been dismissed on the ground that the eviction petition^did not contain the averments to the effect that he was the owner of the tenanted premises and also that he hadlet outthe same to the respondent herein, which were the mainingredients of Section
14(l)(e).
After making some submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this petition so that he can file a fresh eviction petition with all necessary averments.
This petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. As also prayed, the petitioner would be at libertyto file a fresh eviction petition.
AUGUST 18, 2011 nk P.K. BHASIN, 2011:DHC:15787
The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Additional Rent
Controller whereby his eviction petition under Section 14(l)(e) oftheDelhi Rent Control
Act has been dismissed on the ground that the eviction petition^did not contain the averments to the effect that he was the owner of the tenanted premises and also that he hadlet outthe same to the respondent herein, which were the mainingredients of Section
14(l)(e).
After making some submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this petition so that he can file a fresh eviction petition with all necessary averments.
This petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. As also prayed, the petitioner would be at libertyto file a fresh eviction petition.
AUGUST 18, 2011 nk P.K. BHASIN, 2011:DHC:15787
JUDGMENT