Arun Kumar Gupta v. Raj Kumar Agarwal & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 15 Aug 2011 · 2011:DHC:15782
P. K. Bhasin
RC.RI No. 217 of 2011
2011:DHC:15782
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The court dismissed the tenant's petition as not pressed after parties settled, granting time to vacate the premises by 30th April 2012.

Full Text
Translation output
1()
IN rm UK,II coi kt of dffiii ai nfw dffiii
RC.Rl \' . 21 7 201 1
RADlll A 1, \1, Pclilioncr
1hrough: Mr. .Ariin Kumar Ciupla. .Achocalc with petitioner in person
VERSUS
RRAlll .Al) KUM AR ACiARWAl & ORS Respondents
I'hrouph; Mr. B.B. Oupta & Mr. Ravjvot Cihuman.
.\dvoeates
(OR AM:
IION'UI J MR. .11 STIC F P.K. RIIASIN
JUDGMENT

0 R 1) F R % IS.08.2011 1odav eounsel for the petitioner-tenant, who himself is also present in t (uiri savs that there has been a settlement between the parties and the respondents have agreed to grant time to the petitioner to vacate the tenanted premises bv 2()"' April. 2012 and in view of that settlement this present petition can be disposed of as not pressed. Counsel for respondents affirms the aforesaid statement ol the eounsel lor the petitioner. 1he petitioner-tenant now gives an undertaking to the Court to vacate the tenanted premises on or before 30''^.April. 2012 and to surrender its possession onlv to the respondents. In view of the aforesaid, this petition is dismissed as not pressed and the petitumer is granted time to vacate the tenanted premises on or before.30'''.April. \i (;i SI IS, 2()n/p«i V, X 1, \ \ \ w r-'X A A\ C* ^ ^ P.K. BIlAstN,.!