Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Hearing: 2nd August, 2011
Date of Decision: 18th August, 2011
Date of Hearing: 2nd August, 2011
Date of Decision: 18th August, 2011
CRL. A. 43/1998
LAL BABU RAM ...APPELLANT
Through: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Amicus Curiae with
Ms. Stuti Gujral, Advocate.
LAL BABU RAM ...APPELLANT
Through: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Amicus Curiae with
Ms. Stuti Gujral, Advocate.
VERSUS
STATE ...RESPONDENT
Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State.
Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL
JUDGMENT
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Order? No
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No
3. Whether the Order should be reported in the Digest? No
JUDGMENT
G.P. MITTAL, J.
1. The present appeal is dismissed in terms of the judgment passed today in Crl.A.No.20/1998 tilted as ‘Maya Chanchal vs. State’.
2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE (S. RAVINDRA BHAT)
JUDGE AUGUST 18, 2011 vk